Home > Credit Cards > Americans Have Had Chip Cards for a Year. Here’s How It’s Going So Far

Comments 0 Comments

A new rule imposed by the credit card associations took effect Oct. 1, 2015, mandating that merchants accept chip cards or face increased liability for fraud. The date passed last year with a lot of fanfare and considerable frustration; many smaller merchants complained they weren’t ready.

Chip cards had been available for more than a decade, but the U.S. had long been a laggard — until a string of high-profile card database thefts, beginning with Target in late 2013, increased the urgency for conversion. Many consumers received new chip-ready cards soon after, but had no place to use them, as many merchants were reluctant to spend around $1,000 on new chip-read point of sale terminals.

But the 2015 liability shift deadline — which put merchants on the hook for any fraud that could be blamed on old-style magnetic card transactions — nudged many into making the change.

In a new report published to mark the anniversary, Visa said there were more than 363 million Visa chip cards in circulation in the U.S., and nearly 1.5 million chip-activated merchants.

More critically, the kind of fraud the chip cards are designed to thwart is predictably dropping fast.

According to an email from a Visa spokesperson, “counterfeit fraud at chip-activated merchants dropped 47% in May compared to a year earlier.”

Still, there is plenty of room to improve. Chip transactions represent only 37% of Visa’s in-store payment volume, according to Visa’s numbers. As anyone who has struggled with the choice to swipe or insert their plastic when paying at a cash register knows, plenty of stores still haven’t turned on their chip-enabled point of sale terminals yet.

Meanwhile, many consumers complained that the new chip technology was slowing them down; chip transactions could take 10 seconds or longer, when the old swipe was relatively instantaneous.

In March, we reported that four out of five merchants hadn’t turned on their chip readers, mainly because of a backlog in certifications required by banks. A lawsuit seeking class-action status was filed against the associations, with some merchants claiming their fraud bills had soared because of the liability shift while they waited for certification.

But some of those bumps were smoothed. In the spring, long checkout line waits improved when “quick chip” technology was introduced. That shrunk the time needed to keep a card inserted to two seconds or less.

Then this summer, both Visa and MasterCard announced changes to their liability rules that eased off some of the chip card switch pain.

Effective July 22, Visa said it would temporarily prevent banks from forcing merchants to pay for counterfeit card frauds less than $25. Starting in October, banks will be limited to 10 counterfeit chargebacks per merchant account.

“These two changes together will significantly reduce the number [of] chargebacks that merchants are seeing,” Visa said in its statement back in July. “Following these changes, merchants can expect to see 40% fewer counterfeit chargebacks, and a 15% reduction in U.S. counterfeit fraud dollars being charged back.”

So what’s next for EMV? The chip cards were never designed to stop all fraud. They just help make a certain kind of fraud — counterfeit card fraud — much, much harder. Of course, this prompted some criminals to focus their attention on online fraud, as no one inserts a chip card when online shopping. So that may very well be the next frontier for fraud-fighters. Online shoppers will likely be safer when a long-promised “token” system is in place to add security to the so-called “card not present” transactions. Seeing how long chip card adoption took, don’t expect that change to happen in the next few weeks or months, though.

It’s important to remember that your credit card spending can have a big impact on your credit. You can see where your credit currently stands by viewing a free snapshot of your credit reports, updated every 14 days, on Credit.com.

Image: Rostislav_Sedlacek

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team