Home > Identity Theft > Here’s Why Amy Schumer Is the Most Dangerous Person on the Internet

Comments 0 Comments

You may want to think twice before searching for the recent Mets kiss cam video starring comedian Amy Schumer. No, it isn’t something that’s NSFW — you never know with Schumer — but it turns out she is the most dangerous celebrity on the internet. At least that’s what the 10th annual McAfee Most Dangerous Celebrities report says.

How is this comedian so dangerous, you ask?

“Consumers today remain fascinated with celebrity culture and go online to find the latest pop culture news,” Gary Davis, chief consumer security evangelist at Intel Security, said in a press release. “With this craving for real-time information, many search and click without considering potential security risks. Cybercriminals know this and take advantage of this behavior by attempting to lead them to unsafe sites loaded with malware.”

Schumer is topping all kinds of charts this week, also making the fourth spot on the Forbes’ list of highest-paid comedians, earning an estimated $17 million last year — making her the first woman to ever crack the list. Because she was so professionally active, there’s a lot involving her you may want to see. So, whether you’re searching for a review of her new book, “The Girl With the Lower Back Tattoo,” (which is really good, by the way) or a place to download her hit movie, Trainwreck, it’s a good idea to do so with caution (always be careful what links you’re clicking on and only download materials from sites you know are legitimate and trustworthy.)

Schumer and her representatives did not immediately respond to Credit.com’s request for comment.

Who Else is a Little Risky?

Aside from Schumer, Chris Hardwick and Daniel Tosh — who also made the top 10 — there were some other comedians who made the list of the most dangerous celebrities online, including Nikki Glaser (15th), Kevin Hart (25th), Mindy Kaling (30th), Kristen Wiig (52nd), Chelsea Handler (54th) and Ellen DeGeneres (57th).

Stars from the music industry made up half of the top 10 list, but also took up a lot of real estate in the top 30, with stars like Drake (13th), Katy Perry (14th), Jason Aldean (16th), Justin Timberlake (17th), Jennifer Lopez (18th), Lady Gaga (19th), Nicki Minaj (20th), Iggy Azalea (27th), Beyoncé (28th) and Usher (29th).

Here are the top 10 celebrities considered to be the highest-risk to search for online.

  1. Amy Schumer
  2. Justin Bieber
  3. Carson Daly
  4. Will Smith
  5. Rihanna
  6. Miley Cyrus
  7. Chris Hardwick
  8. Daniel Tosh
  9. Selena Gomez
  10. Kesha


To compile this list, Intel Security used ratings from its McAfee WebAdvisor product to determine the number of risky sites created by online searches (on Google, Bing and Yahoo) of celebrity names paired with commonly search terms, like torrent, free MP4 and HD download that were likely to generate malware. From there, Intel established a risk percentage for each celebrity, deeming the most dangerous as ones that are “likely popular search subjects,” according to the press release.

Last Call With Online Security

If you couldn’t resist clicking on a Carson Daly link because you wanted that Total Request Live nostalgia only to discover it was a scam, it may be a good idea to check your credit for any signs that your identity was compromised. Some tell-all signs of this include opened accounts you don’t recognize and a sudden drop in your scores. You can get annual copies of your credit reports for free from the three major credit bureaus — TransUnion, Experian and Equifax — by visiting AnnualCreditReport.com. And you can keep an eye on your credit on a more frequent basis by viewing two of your free credit scores, updated every 14 days, on Credit.com.

Image: YouTube

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team