Home > Identity Theft and Scams > A Wells Fargo Employee Stole My Social Security Number. What Can I Do?

Comments 5 Comments
Advertiser Disclosure


The relationship you have with your bank is a deeply personal one. Think about it: Money carries enormous weight in people’s lives, and where do they keep their money? A bank, usually. In addition to your money, your bank also stores a ton of your sensitive personal information.

So when Brady Cook was a victim of a data breach, he was really surprised by the way his bank handled it. One day in early March, Cook received a letter from Wells Fargo, with some jarring news:

“We want to let you know on January 20, 2016, a Wells Fargo internal investigation discovered an employee accessed your account information without a legitimate business purpose and emailed an image of your profile information to an external Internet site that provides disposable mailbox accounts.”

That image included his name, address, birthdate, phone number, account numbers and Social Security number. The letter went on to tell him that the employee had been fired, that Wells Fargo contacted the email provider and had the information deleted, and that Wells Fargo would provide Cook with 2 years of free credit monitoring and identity theft protection services.

And that was pretty much it: More than a month after the bank discovered the breach, Cook opened his mail to find out some of his most sensitive information had been compromised.

“For something that is so personal and I trust them with, this is a very impersonal measure,” he said of the letter. When we talked to Cook right after he received the letter, he was dissatisfied with the information he was given, and he had lots of questions.

“It’s just very passive. It says we assure you that it no longer exists — well no duh, that’s the point of a temporary email account,” he said. “But for the 15 minutes that it exists, what the hell happened to it?”

Wells Fargo Responds

Cook wanted to know why an employee was even capable of taking a screen shot of his information in the first place. He wanted to know why he only got 2 years of identity theft services, when what this former Wells Fargo employee did puts Cook at lifelong risk of having his identity stolen. (A Social Security number is the holy grail of identity theft, because unlike a bank account number, you can’t easily get a new one, and it can be used to commit fraud in dozens of ways.)

We put each of these questions to Wells Fargo, and they responded to us by email. Here’s what a bank spokesman had to say.

On the 2 years of identity theft services: “24 months of identity theft protection service is an industry standard in these types of cases. We encourage all customers to monitor their accounts and credit on a regular basis, and to do so more closely for the 24-month period after any event that results in the inappropriate exposure or potential exposure of personal or account information, regardless of the cause. If the customer has specific concerns at the end of the 24-month period, we encourage them to contact us.”

In response to the question about why an employee can take screen shots of customer information: “We train our team members on the proper handling of customer information, and continually enhance our policies, procedures, and technology to protect customer information. Unfortunately, despite our best efforts and the training we provided, this individual chose to act in a manner that is inconsistent with our policies and procedures.”

The bank also sent a general statement, saying it has reached out to customers affected by the incident, indicating that Cook was not the only person whose information was compromised. Citing the ongoing investigation, Wells Fargo declined to say how many customers were affected by the former employee’s actions.

The ‘Industry Standard’

It’s true that some sort of complimentary identity theft services is the olive branch financial services typically extend to their customers after a data breach. A few years ago, a year of free services was more common, but as data breaches continue to become an almost normal part of a consumer’s life, that time frame has gotten a little longer.

“A lot of the institutions have gone from one year to two,” said Adam Levin, co-founder of Credit.com and an author of “Swiped”, a recently-published book on the growing threat of identity theft. “There are many people who feel it should be 10. It’s anybody’s guess to if and when something’s going to be used.”

The specific service Cook received was a custom product from Identity Guard, which includes quarterly credit updates, credit reports and scores from each of the three major credit reporting agencies, identity theft victim assistance and $20,000 of identity theft insurance.

Cook has been monitoring his credit (you can do that by getting two free credit scores with regular updates on Credit.com, as well as pulling your free annual credit reports) and, so far, he hasn’t seen any evidence of identity theft. It has now been almost five months since he got that letter from Wells Fargo, and while he says his frustration isn’t as intense as it initially was, he’s still bothered by what happened. The whole experience made him want to cancel his accounts with Wells Fargo, but in the end, he only closed some business accounts he had with the bank.

“I have had accounts with them for over 12 years and I can’t just close those accounts and cards without temporarily hurting my credit,” he said in an email. “I have some high-limit credit cards with them and it helps my utilization ratio since I never get [above] 10% on that card. Also closing accounts and opening new ones requires more credit pulls and other things.”

Cook summed up his experience — and the experience of any victim of a data breach — pretty well in that email: “It’s just a damn hassle.”

Image: AndreyPopov

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team