Home > Personal Finance > Baby Boomers Beware: Scammers Are After Your Parents’ Money

Comments 0 Comments
Advertiser Disclosure


It’s no great secret that I’m a big fan of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and its crucial work to help improve our financial literacy and protect us from financial predators. Since I have dedicated much of my career to helping consumers better understand their own finances and credit, and how to protect and restore their identities after personal compromises or data breaches, I’m thrilled to see more Americans getting the help they need from this proactive agency dedicated to many of the same goals.

Recently, the CFPB issued a series of guidelines for people who, like many of my fellow baby boomers, find themselves managing the finances of elderly friends or relatives. When such management involves handling the financial affairs of a parent, a layer of emotional complexity is added to an already-difficult task.

The agency’s guidelines are clear and straightforward, reminding financial guardians that their participation, while not easy, is necessary when their loved ones can no longer pay their own bills. But, in particular, they help remind financial guardians of the ways in which scam artists target elderly people by appealing to their trust in authority and playing on their fears that they might be doing something wrong.

Common Red Flags

The CFPB warns guardians that a person who is being scammed might withdraw or try to wire large amounts of money, use an ATM more frequently than usual, be unable to pay common expenses or make large “gifts” to a new friend – all signs that a con artist has convinced a loved one to aid and abet in their own swindling. In other cases, financial statements might stop coming to their house (or to yours), money might go walkabout or a new name might appear on a bank account, all of which could be signs of identity theft.

In some situations, the person for whom you are acting as a financial agent might be able to understand that they are being scammed. But, in others, they might be utterly convinced that they doing the right thing, and will refuse to stop. In a recent case highlighted by WBAY reporter Tammy Elliot, Postal Inspector Steve Bolz said that an alert postal clerk tipped him off to the case of a man who was attempting to send $13,000 in cash to a group of lottery scam artists abroad. He was so convinced sending off the money would guarantee his receipt of millions that, even when his package was stopped and returned by the post office, he tried to send it again. His wife was forced to confiscate the cellphone the scam artists had used to con him and closely monitor their accounts – which couldn’t have been easy for her.

Being a Good Guardian

It’s not just your elderly charge who could be targeted. Scam artists know that for many financial guardians their duties are a second shift and they might be otherwise distracted by their day jobs, not to mention other things in their lives. The CFPB recommends that you keep thorough records, research all financial decisions you make for your loved one as though you were making them for yourself, and never accept a deal that is “today only” or which requires you to pay up front for a promised prize or award.

Many people step up to act as their parents’ (or other loved ones’) financial guardians without thinking through the ramifications – in particular, the serious commitment of time and effort required to manage the finances of a second household. As with anything else in life, if you aren’t sure that you’re up to the challenge, the best advice is that which the CFPB doesn’t offer: don’t accept the responsibilities if you can’t live up to them. Better you should help your friend or loved one find someone else who can.

Image: Digital Vision

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team