Home > Managing Debt > Does Credit Counseling Work? Here Are the Facts

Comments 8 Comments
Advertiser Disclosure


Over the years, consumers and reporters have asked me many times whether credit counseling “works.” Reporters wonder whether it’s a legitimate solution for those in debt, while debtors want to know, “Will it work for me so I can get out of debt?”

It’s an important question. Credit counseling is often promoted as the best option for consumers who are having trouble managing debt. In fact, the Credit CARD Act requires credit card issuers to publish, on card statements, a toll-free number for consumers to get credit counseling help.

But until recently, data about the success (or failure) rates of credit counseling programs has been hard to come by. When asked, counseling agencies will often point to numbers of consumers they have helped, or talk about the educational services they provide to consumers. Critics, meanwhile, counter that these programs offer far too little relief, only help a fraction of the people who are in over their heads, or even that counselors are really glorified debt collectors.

Now one national counseling agency, Cambridge Credit Counseling, is revealing detailed data about its credit counseling business. Its Transparency Project finally sheds light on whether credit counseling works, and how many consumers it helps.

“This marks the very first time I can think of when a credit counseling agency has embraced disclosing its performance measurements,” says Steve Rhode, founder of GetOutOfDebt.org. Rhode formerly founded and ran a national credit counseling agency. When writing this story, I asked the National Foundation for Credit Counseling whether similar information was available from member agencies, but I was told it was not.

First, some quick background: When consumers contact a credit counseling agency, they are typically offered a counseling session where they share information about their income, expenses and debts. As a result of that consultation, they may be offered a Debt Management Plan (DMP). Debtors who decide to enroll in a DMP will receive concessions from some or all participating creditors, usually in the form of lower interest rates and/or waiver of penalty fees such as late fees. In a DMP, debtors must typically repay 100% of the principal balance owed, plus interest, to participating creditors within 60 months or less.

According to Cambridge Credit Counseling’s Transparency Project’s 2010 results:

  • After a comprehensive credit review, counselors recommended a Debt Management Plan (DMP) to just over one-third (34%) of consumers. Just under one-quarter (23%) of consumers enrolled in a DMP.
  • Of those who enrolled in a DMP, the typical Cambridge client received an interest rate reduction from 21.62% to 7.96%, saving $181.86 in interest charges per month. Payments were reduced by $192.70.
  • In 2010, Cambridge clients who completed their DMP had done so in an average of 41 months.
  • Clients paid an average initial fee of $41.55 and $24.99 per month for the service.  (Fees were waived or reduced for about 27% of clients.) Creditors also paid the agency an average $12.32 per account per payment, in what’s called “Fair Share.”

So now let’s go back to the question, “Does credit counseling work?” Here are the conclusions I drew…

Debtors who enroll in a DMP do, for the most part, get the relief they seek. Most consumers are looking for lower interest rates and payments, and if they enroll in a DMP, they typically get both. That, in addition to the convenience of one monthly payment paid to the agency, makes a difference. In fact, Cambridge’s 2010 Quality Survey indicates that overall client satisfaction was 97.9% for new clients and 96.7% for existing clients.

In addition, clients in DMPs often develop better financial habits. At the 6-month mark, 75.9% of Cambridge Credit Counseling clients said they had reviewed or revised their budgets, 62.4% were tracking expenses, and 27.7% were building savings.

The majority of debtors who contact a credit counseling agency will not be helped. Despite those positive numbers, just under one-quarter of consumers who contacted this credit counseling agency enrolled in a Debt Management Plan, the key product offered. To be fair, Christopher Viale, the president and CEO of Cambridge Credit Counseling Corp., estimated that roughly 20% of consumers who contact his organization “can manage their debt on their own, they just need some fine-tuning of their budget.” He also pointed out that some debtors who don’t enroll in a DMP when it is first proposed “come back later when they realize they can’t do it alone.”

Not all clients who enroll in a DMP complete it, either. Some drop out for positive reasons (such as getting back on track, or paying off their remaining debt more quickly), while others drop out for negative reasons (because they can’t keep up with their payments, or to file for bankruptcy, for example). Cambridge reported losing 16.7% of its DMP client base in 2010.

What’s Next?

Other counseling agencies should be required to reveal these kinds of numbers. If creditors are going to be required to refer consumers to these agencies under federal law, there is no reason they shouldn’t be required to make this kind of information public. While I suspect the numbers Cambridge Credit Counseling has disclosed are be similar to those of other reputable national counseling agencies, it is critical that regulators, policymakers and consumers have access to this type of data.

Secondly, legislators need to take a serious look at whether enough is being done to assist consumers who want to pay back their debt and avoid bankruptcy. Bankruptcy laws were tightened in 2005 (before the economic meltdown), making it more difficult to file for bankruptcy. Viale estimates that about 30% can’t afford the payments proposed under a DMP. If that’s correct, legislators need to take a hard look at whether more consumers could participate in DMPs if creditors offered better concessions, including reductions of interest to 0% and/or less-than-full-balance payment programs.

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team