Home > Identity Theft > Freedom of Speech or ID Theft?

Comments 2 Comments

A Utah District Court ruling may have big ramifications on whether free speech can cross the line over to identity theft.

The case, which involves a media hoax against a major U.S. company by an environmental group, may lean on what the definition of a “prank” is – and whether it can actually be described as identity theft.


The lawsuit stems from a group of hackers who built a fake Web site and slapped Koch Industries name on it, and rolled it out to the public on December 10, 2010. The privately held company is one of the world’s largest provider of fertilizers and chemicals, and is frequently criticized by climate change advocates for its funding of climate change skeptic groups.

One environmental group – the Youth for Climate Truth – has been linked to the fake Web site, which included the same Web address and the same home page of Koch Industries. In addition, the fake site posted some pro-climate change statements, and claimed that the company would soon begin funding pro-climate change environmental groups.

But Koch attorneys want the names of the individuals at the YCT, so they can prosecute them, potentially under identity theft and fraud laws. Specifically, Koch says that individuals in the YCT have violated federal laws on trademarks, cyber squatting, unfair competition and violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

[Product Spotlight: Identity Theft Protection Gives You Peace of Mind]

In early January, a U.S. District Court judge gave Koch the green light to speed up the process of getting the names of those individuals purported to be behind the Web site hoax.

In its defense, a spokesman for the Youth for Climate Truth says that individuals in the group are protected by free speech laws, and in no way engaged in any identity fraud or computer fraud.

“What Koch needs to understand is people have a First Amendment right to criticize people on the Internet – and that includes powerful corporations and government,” Deepak Gupta, an attorney for Public Citizen, told the Associated Press on January 27, 2010. “You can’t simply hire a lawyer and file a lawsuit to try to unmask your political critics because we have a First Amendment in this country. It allows you to speak out, and it allows you to speak out anonymously.”

For its part, Koch said the issue wasn’t about free speech – but about the theft of intellectual property. “This is not a lawsuit about freedom of speech. We believe in a vigorous political debate,” the company said in a statement. “We are not seeking in any way to silence our critics,” Koch said in a statement Thursday. “This lawsuit was filed because the integrity of our computer systems and our valuable intellectual property was compromised and used without permission, in violation of … federal law.”

[Resource: 12 Tips for Protecting Your Identity]

To prove its case, Koch will need to bring those anonymous Youth for Climate Change members they hold responsible for the fake Web site out into broad daylight.

If, and when the company does, the country may get a good lesson in what constitutes a hoax – and what constitutes identity fraud.

Image by RealtorKimWood, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Arkhaik Deliberately Misspelled

    What precisely is meant by the term ‘hacker’? the title “Youth for Climate Change” implies young people, and unless they can actually program they should not be classified as ‘hackers’ and even if they can, they would be classified as ‘Phishers’.

  • http://www.identitytheftprotection.org/ Edward

    Identity thieves doesn’t choose a place where to commit fraud. Anywhere you are, you have to be careful. Even if you’re at an airport, you must still secure your identity against them.

  • Pingback: How can I move my blog to a domain named page, and what software do I use? | Great Minds Think Alike()

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team