Home > Mortgages > Higher Mortgage Rates Haven’t Deterred Buyers

Comments 0 Comments
Advertiser Disclosure


[UPDATE: Some offers mentioned below have expired and/or are no longer available on our site. You can view the current offers from our partners in our credit card marketplace. DISCLOSURE: Cards from our partners are mentioned below.]

In the past few weeks the cost of obtaining a new mortgage has climbed as a result of higher mortgage rates. And while consumers are expressing worries over this new trend, those fears have not yet translated to the market itself.

At the end of June, 13 percent of consumers said that if mortgage interest rates climb into the 4 percent range — which they since have — that they would find it far more difficult to be able to afford a home, according to a recent poll by the real estate industry tracking firm Trulia.

Meanwhile, roughly one in five responded similarly about interest rates climbing to 5 percent, and slightly more than that felt this way about levels of around 6 percent. In all, 41 percent of those polled said that their biggest potential fear if they were to try to buy a house now would be that rates would increase before they were actually able to close the deal.

The reason for this is obvious, though, because higher interest rates mean higher monthly costs to meet mortgage payment requirements, the report said. For instance, the national average was at about 3.35 percent in May, meaning that monthly payments on 30-year fixed loans worth $200,000 would cost $881. However, with rates coming in at 4.46 percent in late June — constituting a 14 percent increase in less than six weeks — the same loan would cost $1,009 per month.

But despite the consumers’ stated concerns, the increase in rates seems to have had little impact on home purchases, the report said. The most recent data from the Mortgage Bankers Association shows that the number of applications for new mortgages rose 2 percent from May to June, and by the end of the latter month was up 11 percent on an annual basis. However, current homeowners who may have wanted to refinance are certainly feeling the sting from spiking rates, as applications to alter existing loans fell 24 percent month-over-month and 40 percent from the same time last year.

Despite the recent increases, mortgage rates remain extremely affordable on a historical basis, as they are still lower than what most homeowners are paying currently. However, the combination of rising prices and interest rates together could serve to significantly reduce affordability over the next few years from the all-time low levels observed from the start of 2012 until now.

Image: iStockphoto

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team