Home > Identity Theft > Life After Ashley Madison: How to Operate in a World Without Secrets

Comments 0 Comments

The other cufflink fell on the Ashley Madison hack Tuesday.

According to Wired, 9.7 gigabytes of Ashley Madison data were dumped on the dark web, and the collection appears to “include account details and log-ins for some 32 million users.” Where we go from here is anyone’s guess.


According to the Wired article, the hackers left a note with the quarry of ill-gotten files of marital listlessness: “Avid Life Media has failed to take down Ashley Madison and Established Men. We have explained the fraud, deceit, and stupidity of ALM and their members. Now everyone gets to see their data.” The data includes names (many presumably aliases), email addresses, street addresses (harder to fake because these are tied to billing), amounts charged on credit cards and potentially enough credit card information to re-identify an account with a particular user (the last four digits of an account number or a transaction ID).

There is a mad dash now to rummage through that Dumpster-full of names on the dark web, with the first tack a search for email addresses tied to government accounts. According to U.K.’s Sky News, “15,000 US military and government email addresses are registered on the database, including executives in high-level positions.” It also reported “email addresses linked to the White House and NASA, as well as the Vatican and the United Nations.”

Among the horde in the coliseum of moral schadenfreude and the media companies that feed the public’s insatiable appetite for tales of other people’s woe, news of this or that now-public indiscretion will be greeted with glee. For those exposed by the hack, the news will create a spontaneous bouquet of shrugs, denials, tortured apologies and long explanations that no one really wants to wade through, but most will read with rapt attention.

The hack of Ashley Madison and Established Gentleman is of course part a bigger story. There are more than a billion records with significantly more personally identifying information out there. Data breaches have become the third certainty in life, right behind death and taxes. Up to now, the kind of information most often exposed in a breach was of concern because it could be used to harm our financial lives and even our well being (like medical identity theft). What differentiates the ALM hack is that it has moral ramifications. Of course, the damage is also of a material stripe, since it could spur costly life changes due to extinct relationships that might otherwise have survived a rough patch, and even a stray act of cyber-wandering.

The Real Damage Is Emotional

Impact Team, the hackers behind the Ashley Madison hack, provided some advice when they dumped the files on the dark web: “Find someone you know in here? Keep in mind the site is a scam with thousands of fake female profiles. See ashley madison [sic] fake profile lawsuit; 90-95% of actual users are male. Chances are your man signed up on the world’s biggest affair site, but never had one. He just tried to. If that distinction matters.”

The tone of the Impact Team is decidedly of the Somebody Done Somebody Wrong variety. But while that makes for a good song, it’s not how the world works. No one can argue that the Impact Team hasn’t lived up to its name. But with the extinction of privacy upon us, what did it actually accomplish beyond creating a very good example for those who make it their business to help others navigate the post-privacy world— both on- and offline? One could argue not much. Their goal was to make a moral point, but the result may well be a de-sensitization to morally fluid behavior. In a world where no one’s perfect and there is no meaningful privacy, who really cares who knows what?

What Do You Do in a World Without Secrets?

The same rules apply whether you are using social media of the more socially acceptable variety or the verboten kind: Lie. Prevaricate. Dissemble.

You have to tell a bank, and of course your employer, the particulars of who you are. They need your real name, your Social Security number (SSN) and your date of birth. (After all, providing them with fake information can constitute fraud.) You have to tell other organizations, like doctors and the IRS, certain facts about your life, and of course the act of doing business with a retailer is synonymous with telling the world about it, since breaches are so prevalent. But creating an online alias and protecting some of your most valuable pieces of personally identifying information (PII) on social media and other sites can go a long way in helping you operate on the Web without becoming exposed. Here are some tips to do just that:

  1. Never use your real name. Use a nickname that your acquaintances know or create an alter-ego.
  2. Never share your date of birth.
  3. Create a unique email account—or what’s commonly referred to as a burner account—not the one you use for personal correspondence and managing your finances.
  4. If you pay by credit card, bear in mind you potentially just blew your alias in the event of a hack.

If your financial details or SSN get exposed in a hack, you don’t want it to destroy your credit (on top of everything else). Keep an eye on your financial accounts – look at your statements online every day – and check your credit reports and scores regularly.You can get your free annual credit reports on AnnualCreditReport.com, and you can get your credit scores every month on Credit.com to monitor for signs of fraud like newly opened accounts you don’t recognize.

In a world where there are no secrets, you either have to be a saint, very careful … or have no shame.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its partners.

More on Identity Theft:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team