Home > News > NJ Man Orders $3,750 Bottle of Wine Thinking It’s $37.50

Comments 0 Comments
Advertiser Disclosure


A New Jersey man experienced what most consumers would consider a restaurant nightmare: He ordered a bottle of wine he thought cost $37.50, when its real price tag didn’t have a decimal point. That’s right — he says he accidentally ordered a $3,750 bottle of wine for a dinner he wasn’t paying for.

The details of this debacle are in dispute, according to the New Jersey Star-Ledger, which reported the fiasco in its “Bamboozled” series. Joe Lentini was dining at Bobby Flay Steak at Borgata Hotel Casino & Spa in Atlantic City with a party of 10, and he and some others decided to split a bottle of wine. Lentini says he asked the server for a recommendation — he’s not a big drinker, he told the Star-Ledger — and she pointed one out. He asked for the price and said the server replied, “Thirty-seven fifty.”

The group ate. Lentini and some others drank the wine. The bill came, and even at a pricey restaurant, the total was way more than expected: $4,700.61, including tax. The restaurant and diners have their own sides of the story — Lentini and those sitting near him said the server should have clearly said “three-thousand seven-hundred-fifty,” which they claim she did not, and a vice president of the restaurant says he believes the server and sommelier followed proper practices.

In the end, the restaurant said $2,200 was the least amount of money it could accept for the wine (Screaming Eagle, Oakville 2011), so Lentini and two others paid the bill so they could leave.

Lentini will certainly have a new mindset with ordering wine in the future. Let his experience sit in the back of your mind when you go to a restaurant, as well.

We hope that you’ll never have to deal with something like this, but it’s not uncommon to be surprised by a price tag after you’ve already committed to a purchase. Obviously, you want to avoid incurring the cost in the first place, but you can also make unexpected bills more manageable by putting them on a credit card. Also, if there’s a dispute over the price you were charged for an item, a credit card has certain protections that may help you sort out the issue with the weight of your credit card issuer on your side.

An emergency is an emergency, but keep in mind that maxing out a credit card to cover an unexpected $4,000 purchase can have a negative impact on your credit scores in the long term. In fact, if you’re spending more than 30% of your credit card’s limit, you may already be doing damage. You can see how your credit card balance is impacting your credit scores for free on Credit.com.

More Money-Saving Reads:

Image: iStockbott

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team