Home > Mortgages > Are Older Americans Souring on Homeownership?

Comments 0 Comments
Advertiser Disclosure


Renting a property, whether it’s an apartment or a whole house, has become extremely popular in the last few years as a result of the difficult economy and flagging housing market, but new improvements in both seem to be encouraging many to turn their eyes toward homeownership.

The vast majority of people consider both homeownership and renting to be good experiences, but the number who view the former as being “very positive” is nearly double that of those who feel the same about renting, according to new data from the government-sponsored mortgage backing enterprise Fannie Mae.

Currently, 71 percent of those polled felt homeownership was “very positive,” versus just 34 percent for renting. Meanwhile, 17 percent of respondents said they believe that renting can be a somewhat or very negative experience, compared with just 5 percent for owning.

The reasons for these positive feelings are myriad, the report said. Those who felt they were better off renting said it was beneficial for helping to stay within their budget, avoid stress and wait out the current economic climate. Meanwhile, they also had far better opinions of ownership, because it might give them a better chance to control their living space, have more privacy, and live in better areas or properties, among others. They generally felt ownership was better in terms of both lifestyle and financial reasons, as well.

Young renters, between the ages of 18 and 34, were actually more likely than their older counterparts to have a positive view of ownership versus renting, as 57 percent of that demographic felt that it would be preferable for both lifestyle and financial reasons, compared with 51 percent of renters overall, the report said. In fact, 49 percent of young people said their reason for renting was so that they could become financially capable of buying a home in the future, compared with just 26 percent of people 35 or older. Among that group, slightly less than a quarter felt that renting was a more affordable option, while just 15 percent of younger people.

Homeownership, however, may still be somewhat difficult for many consumers to achieve even if they are financially ready to do so, because lending restrictions currently in place may make it extremely difficult for those without exceptional credit to obtain a mortgage. For this reason, prospective owners may want to significantly improve their standings before they apply.

Image: iStockphoto

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team