Home > Identity Theft and Scams > Poll: Americans Understand Online Tracking. And They Don’t Like It.

Comments 0 Comments
Advertiser Disclosure


Most Americans understand that their activities online are constantly being monitored. And they don’t like it one bit. New survey results detailing Americans’ aversion to being tracked online could help bolster support for new legislation in Congress to give consumers a “Do Not Track” option when it comes to online advertising.

According to a recent survey by Credit.com conducted by GfK Custom Research, three-quarters of Americans are aware that programs on their computers are tracking where they surf online, and simultaneously gathering personal details about them. They also know that these programs are very difficult to disable or delete despite their best efforts, as we covered here and here.

An even bigger majority – 80% – wants the tracking to stop. They refuse to tolerate tracking, even if it means better deals on products they want.

[Article: How to Avoid Online Tracking. (Hint: You Can’t.)]

A bill by Congresswoman Jackie Speier (D – CA) would help enable consumers to opt out of such online tracking. Introduced last week, the Do Not Track Me Online Act would do for online advertising what the Do Not Call registry did for Do Not Call, giving consumers the chance to block advertising companies from placing tracking software on their computers.

“Consumers have a right to determine what if any of their information is shared with big corporations,” Speier said in a press release, “and the federal government must have the authority and tools to enforce reasonable protections.”

According to the Credit.com survey, awareness of online tracking was fairly consistent across all age groups except for senior citizens. Only 57% of people age 65 and older understand that their activities and personal information is being gathered online.

The biggest difference in awareness was based on income. Among people who earn less than $20,000 a year, 60% understand tracking. Awareness soared to 84% among people earning over $75,000. Those in the Northeast are most tuned-in, with 81% aware of online tracking, while in the Midwest the awareness rate falls to 68%.

Meanwhile, people of all ages almost uniformly oppose tracking. A third of people making under $20,000 said they can tolerate it, but all other income groups were similarly opposed.

This national RDD Probability Sample telephone poll was conducted for Credit.com by GfK Custom Research North America from January 14-16, 2011. A total of 1,004 interviews were completed, with roughly 531 female adults and 473 male adults. The margin of error is +/- 3 percentage points for the full sample.

[Article: Don’t Track Me: The War Over Online Ads Starts Now]

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team