Home > News > Should Colleges Have an Easier Time Declaring Bankruptcy?

Comments 0 Comments
Advertiser Disclosure


A provocative op-ed appeared in The Hill the other day. In it, the author—a former counsel to the U.S. Department of Education—proposes lowering the barriers to bankruptcy for colleges and universities.

Given that more than half of all higher-education institutions in the U.S. are experiencing varying degrees of financial distress, the notion of insolvency is more than an academic hypothetical.

    Call now for a FREE consultation
    CALL 844-639-6956

    Yet from a practical standpoint, a bankruptcy filing has little appeal for schools for a pretty big reason: Any higher-education institution that chooses to take that action will immediately lose access to the various federal loan programs and grants on which its core revenue model depends.

    That a school is loath to declare insolvency may also lead to other problems as it works to resolve its difficulties.

    Troubled enterprises often pursue three turnaround methods: an operational restructure in which strategies are employed to increase revenues and decrease expenses; asset restructures where surplus possessions are sold for the cash needed to pay down debts; and financial restructures in which existing obligations are renegotiated for more favorable repayment terms.

    The final method becomes much harder to accomplish when a fiscally challenged company takes the bankruptcy option off the table. That’s because bankruptcy is the last thing a lender wants to have happen: The process is slow, the costs are high and the outcome is uncertain. So when a creditor knows that bankruptcy is a nonstarter for its debtor, the negotiating power shifts to the creditor’s side of the table, which is a good part of the reason why the op-ed’s author advocates for changing the rules.

    When you think about it, though, the scenario I just described isn’t all that different for student borrowers.

    Bankruptcy for them is a virtual impossibility, albeit for other reasons (education-related debt cannot be discharged except in extreme circumstances). So it’s fair to ask why the schools should be favored over those who, some would argue, have been harmed by the business practices they employ.

    In fact, by choosing the interests of students over that of the schools they attend, the very trajectory of higher education costs and, consequently, that of the macro economy would be influenced for the better. Here’s why.

    Assuming colleges are able to have continued access to federal funding, those that choose bankruptcy can look forward to having their financial and other contractual obligations restructured, if not fully discharged. Thereafter, it’ll be up to institutional leadership and the boards that are charged with their oversight to determine how to make the best use of this fresh start within a competitive world that remains, for the most part, unchanged.

    By contrast, granting student borrowers the ability to discharge their education-related debts accomplishes three important things.

    First, the mere threat of declaring bankruptcy for what are essentially unsecured loans should motivate otherwise obdurate lenders, investors and loan servicers to offer more substantive solutions to financially distressed borrowers—something that’s not happening now.

    Second, a statutory right to bankruptcy will cause education-related loans to become significantly less attractive to all lenders—government and private alike. In turn, institutional revenues would be negatively affected (because the majority of college students borrow to fund their education), which would leave the schools with no alternative but to do what they should have done long ago: rein in costs.

    Once payments for the loans already on the books are made more affordable, as well as for the cost of higher education going forward, then college graduates may no longer be compelled to move back home, forego major purchases and delay important life events such as marriage or starting a family—all of which benefits our national economy.

    A streamlined path through bankruptcy for the schools? Sure. But not before we attend to those who need that more.

    This story is an Op-Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its affiliates.

    More on Student Loans:

    Image: Fuse

    Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

    Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

    Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

    Hello, Reader!

    Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

    Our People

    The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

    Our Reporting

    We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

    The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

    In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

    Our Business Model

    Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

    Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

    Your Stories

    Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

    Thanks for stopping by.

    - The Credit.com Editorial Team