Home > Student Loans > Student Loans… But Only for Some

Comments 0 Comments
Advertiser Disclosure


I recently read a disturbing article in a financial-industry publication.

In it, the writer attempts to explain why so few student loans have been refinanced at a time when mortgage borrowers have had little trouble accomplishing the same. This has been the case despite education loan delinquency and default rates that are not only compromising the financial independence of a generation of borrowers but also threatening the broader U.S. economy.

According to the article, the fact that so many student debtors are struggling is precisely why lenders are reticent to refinance. The thinking is that restructuring troubled loans is a wasted effort when, in the end, borrowers will have no choice but to pay up anyway. After all, the loans are virtually discharge-proof in bankruptcy, thanks to the financial industry’s successful lobbying efforts.

What’s not mentioned, however, are the other reasons regulated lenders such as banks are loath to help. Take for example the rules that govern so-called troubled debt restructures. Because education loans are uncollateralized, restructuring these for borrowers who would otherwise be unable to make their payments will lead to losses for the lenders that elect to do so.

And then there’s the matter of the institutions’ own financing methods.

[Offer: Increase your knowledge. Boost your confidence. The Life Happens Course Book by Credit.com Contributor Mitchell D. Weiss is your ticket to a financially savvy future.]

Much of this debt—including loans that are federally guaranteed (FFEL, for example)—has been securitized, which means that it’s not just the originating lenders that are reluctant to face financial reality, it’s also the investors who are unwilling to accept anything less than the yields they were promised.

But as unsettling as that continues to be, it’s the direction in which the industry appears to be headed that’s just as troubling.

Rather than addressing the damage that’s been done—by implementing a comprehensive solution to the existing debt problem, or by formulating an action plan for reducing the unsustainably high cost of higher education that’s led to that—lenders, private equity firms and venture capitalists are turning their attention to other potentially lucrative ways of financing an upward cost spiral that won’t be reversed any time soon.

I’m referring to loans that are being offered to a select few on the basis of the schools they attend, their areas of study and the income they can be expected to earn as a result, especially for financing arrangements that call for a share of that future payday in exchange for the upfront dollars.

As a lender, I have no quarrel with credit underwriting methodologies that take into account, among other things, a given borrower’s long-term repayment ability. But in this case, it’s also important to think as a taxpayer with a social conscience.

[Offer: 10% off The Life Happens Course Book by Credit.com Contributor Mitchell D. Weiss. Your ticket to a financially savvy future.]

In particular, I worry about adverse selection: how academically average students attending middle-of-the-road private and public institutions will have little choice but to finance their equally expensive educations with government-guaranteed loans—the same loans that may very well burden taxpayers when the borrowers are unable to find jobs that pay enough. This approach is also yet another example of a culture of disproportionality that promises to widen an already extensive gulf that exists between economic haves and have-nots.

Look, there will always be demand for concierge-level education just as there is for exclusive housing, travel and healthcare. The macroeconomic question we should seriously contemplate, however, is this: Will those at the top who are able to afford all these things consume enough to make up for those in the middle and at the bottom who won’t?

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its affiliates.

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.


Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team