Home > News > The Wealthiest Americans Are Giving Less to Charity

Comments 0 Comments
Advertiser Disclosure


Americans gave more to charities in 2012 than they did in 2006, which is great news for nonprofits, but a closer look at people’s generosity shows a puzzling — and somewhat upsetting — shift in behavior. The Chronicle of Philanthropy analyzed data from the Internal Revenue Service for donation figures and noted the trend in its recent “How America Gives” report.

As wealthy taxpayers’ incomes increased, their charitable giving didn’t keep up (according to donations claimed on tax forms, which account for about 80% of giving). Meanwhile, middle- and lower-income Americans gave a greater share of their incomes to charity.

In numerical terms it breaks down like this: People who earned $200,000 or more annually decreased the share of their income donated to charity by 4.6% from 2006 to 2012; those making less than $100,000 increased the donated portion of their earnings by 4.5%. Despite the seemingly backward trend, wealthy Americans donated $4.6 billion more than they did in 2006 (adjusted for inflation).

This isn’t necessarily an indication that wealthy people are withholding generosity (though it’s easy to see it that way). These figures could reflect a common budgetary habit. Say you make less money or keep the same salary as cost of living increases: You might not respond by adjusting all your spending habits. You donated $50 to your sister’s fundraiser last year, so you decide to donate $50 the next, or perhaps $60, as a sign of your commitment. At the same time, if you saw your income increase, you might increase your $200 donation to $225, not thinking about the fact that your 12.5% increase in donation doesn’t reflect the 20% jump in earnings you enjoyed since last year.

No one’s saying you have to bump up your charitable donations with every raise you get, either. Each person’s budget should suit his or her financial priorities, and the hope is you can spare some money for causes you care about. Keep in mind an organization must meet IRS qualifications for receiving tax-deductible donations, and you should watch out for scam charities looking to steal your money.

Whatever these figures mean about the attitudes of wealthy and non-wealthy people, there are some interesting points worth highlighting:

Utah earned the title as “most generous state,” as Utahns donate 6.56% of their earnings to charity, on average. New Hampshire is on the other end of the spectrum with donations accounting for 1.74% of incomes, on average. In 36 of the 50 largest U.S. cities, residents reduced their charitable giving over the course of six years, and residents of Las Vegas (a city hit hard by the recession) increased their giving most: It was up 14.9% from 2006 (about twice as much as second-place finisher Jacksonville, Fla.).

More Money-Saving Reads:

Image: Fuse

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team