Home > Mortgages > Want to Buy a Home in One of These 17 Markets? You’d Better Have Cash

Comments 0 Comments

In 2005, Randy Moss, then a wide receiver for the Minnesota Vikings, pretended to moon Packers fans after scoring a touchdown. The NFL fined him $10,000. Asked by a reporter how he would pay, Moss responded succinctly: “Straight cash, homey.”

While cash purchases have dropped since the housing market bottomed out in 2012, many areas are still dominated by buyers taking the Moss approach when buying a home. According to data published by ATTOM Data Solutions (formerly RealtyTrac), at least 45% of the sales made in 17 metro areas were conducted using cash in 2016.

Cash sales are common in Florida, where retirees use the proceeds from sales in their home markets to buy retirement properties. But in other places, the prevalence of cash sales is driven largely by institutional investors, which ATTOM defines as any entity that buys at least 10 properties in a year, said Daren Blomquist, senior vice president for the property data company. In Binghamton, New York, where nearly 70% of home sales in 2016 were made in cash, the rise of such purchases over the past three years mirrors a rise in institutional investor sales.

The following are the 17 metro areas where cash sales were most common in 2016. (A note about the data: Some states are not required to disclose property sale information publicly, so there’s no cash-sale data for Alaska, Indiana, Louisiana, Missouri, New Mexico, Texas or Utah. Percentage denotes portion of total home sales that were made in cash.)

  1. Cape Coral-Fort Myers, Florida: 45%
  2. Huntington-Ashland, West Virginia, Kentucky, Ohio: 45.7%
  3. Trenton, New Jersey: 46%
  4. North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton, Florida: 47.2%
  5. Fort Smith, Arkansas, Oklahoma: 47.6%
  6. Ocala, Florida: 47.7%
  7. Urban Honolulu, Hawaii: 47.7%
  8. Atlantic City-Hammonton, New Jersey: 48.3%
  9. Reading, Pennsylvania: 48.4%
  10. Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, Florida: 48.8%
  11. Raleigh, North Carolina: 50.1%
  12. Naples-Immokalee-Marco Island, Florida: 52.4%
  13. Montgomery, Alabama: 52.5%
  14. Macon, Georgia: 52.5%
  15. Syracuse, New York: 58.4%
  16. Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, New York: 63.6%
  17. Binghamton, New York: 69.4%

Who’s Got All That Cash?

Institutional investors — mostly big banks — gobbled up lots of houses after the recession in big markets like Phoenix and Atlanta, but smaller copycats, operating in smaller markets, adopted the practice in recent years. These mid-tier investors usually seek homes priced around $150,000 or less, Blomquist said.

“They’re looking typically for starter homes they can rent out to people who would otherwise be first-time home buyers,” he said.

Recently, a number of web-based companies that allow individuals to buy, rehabilitate and rent properties remotely have sprung up, Blomquist said. These companies, like, for example, HomeUnion, Investability and Roofstock, typically pay cash for properties as well.

Institutional buyers can squeeze out regular folks looking to buy homes for themselves, but there’s good news for these people. Blomquist expects the practice to become less prevalent as banks become more willing to finance purchases. A drop in distressed sales, which in many states must be conducted in cash, should also contribute to a decline in cash purchases.

If you are looking to finance a new home, be sure to check your credit score to make sure it’s up to snuff — your lender certainly will. You can review two of your credit scores for free, updated every 14 days, on Credit.com. And make sure to avoid the pitfalls a lot of first-time homebuyers make.

Image: courtneyk

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team