Home > Identity Theft > WikiLeaks: Fantasy Hacker Cyberworld of Good and Evil

Comments 1 Comment

What does the future of political protest look like in a highly digitalized world? We’re watching it unfold in real time through WikiLeaks’ Cablegate.

The day the cables were slated for release in major newspapers around the world, a so-called “political hacker” took down the WikiLeaks site with a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack. He later wrote on Twitter that he went after the site for “attempting to endanger the lives of our troops and other assets.”


WikiLeaks moved the site from its Swedish webhost to Amazon.com-owned Elastic Cloud Computing (EC2) in Ireland. After U.S. Senator Joseph Lieberman contacted Amazon about hosting the site, Amazon discontinued service to WikiLeaks, citing terms of use.

Then the free-for-all began. Hackers got involved again, this time on WikiLeaks’ behalf, targeting Amazon. When PayPal froze payments to WikiLeaks, the hacking group Anonymous, which organized the Amazon attacks, focused on bringing down the online pay site. When MasterCard announced it would stop transactions on WikiLeaks’ behalf, MasterCard.com was attacked.

[Related Article: How to Spot, and Avoid, Internet Scammers]

Since then Visa.com has been hit with a DDoS attack, as has the website for the Swedish prosecutor and the lawyer representing the two women who have brought sexual misconduct charges against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. As the story progresses, I’m sure we’ll see more sites, for and against WikiLeaks, suffer hacker wrath.

This isn’t the first example of a DDoS domino effect, but it’s certainly the highest profile. We’re sure to see more stories like this. With the success of movies like The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, in which hacking against evil government and corporate forces is elevated to a new kind of heroism, we’re bound to see more. The mythology is already forming: a new type of cyberwarfare engaged in the never-ending battle of good and evil.

[Featured Product: Identity Theft Protection]

Yet with all this hoopla, we can’t lose sight of the lesson. The data breach that started it all, like so many others that don’t grab headlines, stemmed from poor information-access policies. Politics and protests aside, security professionals need to understand the risk of large systems in which information is shared across separate organizations. The tale of the Army private with access to high-level State Department information should force us not just to comment on the story, or wage protest online, but to ask the basic questions of computer security: Who has access to your information? And have they been vetted?

Image by Adobe of Chaos, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team