Home > Mortgages > 7 Loans You Thought Had Disappeared

Comments 0 Comments
Advertiser Disclosure


You don’t hear much about certain types of mortgages these days. Option ARMs, interest-only, stated income, no-money down, teaser rates – many of the most popular types of mortgages from the days of the housing bubble have virtually disappeared.

But are they really extinct? Or have they simply gone into hibernation, waiting to emerge again when the economic climate is once again favorable for them?

While some of these truly seem to be gone for good, others have simply retreated to a specific niche in the market. And still others are beginning to re-emerge after a period of dormancy.

Here’s a look at some of the better known “extinct” mortgages, along with what mortgage professionals have to say about their current status.

Stated Income

Stated income mortgages, or “liar loans” as they were known during the housing bubble, were widely blamed for enabling many borrowers to get into mortgages they couldn’t afford. They’re called stated income because no proof of the borrower’s income is required – the borrower can simply state an income figure and the lender will accept it.

These days, you can’t get a mainstream mortgage – a conforming loan backed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, or one backed by a government entity such as the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) – without documenting your income. However, specialized lenders are beginning to deal in them once again.

Why? Because stated income loans have long been popular with self-employed individuals who maximize the deductions on their tax returns, or who have substantial assets but whose income varies from year to year. As a result, their tax returns may not give a full picture of their financial state.

“You may have a doctor who has $500,000 in income but only $50,000 on his return,” said Bruce Spector, a loan consultant with Summit Funding in Reno, Nev. “So that’s great at tax time, but when it comes to qualifying for a mortgage, they can’t do that.”

A stated income mortgage allows such people to qualify on just their credit rating and assets, along with the appraised value of the property.

Spector said stated income loans are making a comeback because, in today’s “yield-starved environment,” where CDs and bonds are typically paying less than 1% interest, some investors are turning to privately funded mortgages in hopes of getting better returns on their investments.

“They’re looking for returns, they’re willing to take that risk,” he said. “There’s money in that, so they’re willing to look at the non-traditional mortgages.”

He said investment firms and private investors put together pools of money that they offer to mortgage banks and brokers to make available to borrowers. It’s not a product that the larger banks typically offer these days, he said. Instead, they tend to stick to mortgages that can be guaranteed by an entity like Fannie Mae or the FHA.

No Money Down

It was pretty common to be able to buy a home with no down payment during the first half of the last decade. Some lenders simply didn’t require them and you could even get a no-money-down conforming mortgage backed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac by taking out a “piggyback” loan to cover the down payment.

These days, zero-down-payment mortgages are almost impossible for most borrowers to get. However, they’re not completely gone. You can still get a no-money-down mortgage through the VA if you’re a qualifying veteran or active-duty member of the military. Also, borrowers with low-to-moderate incomes may be able to get a USDA Rural Development loan with no money down to buy a modest home in a rural area or small community.

Though zero-down-payment mortgages are still hard to come by, it’s becoming much easier to get a mortgage with a small down payment. In fact, it’s even possible now to get a conventional mortgage with only 3% down without going through the FHA, according to Richard Whitman, vice president of mortgage lending for Texas Trust Credit Union.

That’s because mortgage insurers are becoming more comfortable with insuring those loans, he said.

“If you’ve got a good credit score with 3% down, the [private mortgage insurance] isn’t that bad,” Whitman said, referring to the private mortgage insurance (PMI) required on conventional loans with less than 20% down.

Whitman said you can still get a 3% down Fannie/Freddie-type mortgage even with a credit score in the 660-680 range these days, although the PMI will be fairly costly to someone with a score of 720 or better. But increasing the down payment to 5% will reduce the cost of PMI significantly, he said.


During the housing bubble, it was possible for a borrower on a tight budget to get a mortgage where they only had to pay the interest charges and nothing toward the principle – at least temporarily. Eventually though, they had to start making principle payments or refinance into a new interest-only loan. When falling property values made it almost impossible to refinance, these people had to start paying principle – and those who couldn’t afford that lost their homes to foreclosure.

These days, virtually no lender will let you buy a buy a home with an interest-only mortgage. There is, however, one place where interest-only loans are still found – in home construction. Builders will take out a short-term interest-only loan to cover the cost of construction, which will then be converted to a fully amortizing loan when the home is completed and transferred to a new owner.

“Those have always made sense for investors who wish to keep costs low during the first part of the loan, tie up as little money as possible,” said Summit Funding’s Spector.

Spector said he’s seen interest-only construction loans coming back to a certain extent, but doesn’t handle them himself. He said such loans are available only through private capital/hard money lending, similar to how stated income loans are handled these days.

Negative Amortization

Going even beyond interest-only mortgages were negative amortization loans. On these mortgages, it wasn’t even a requirement to keep up with the interest payments – a borrower’s monthly payment could be less than the interest charges, meaning that the mortgage balance, the amount owed on the loan, would actually increase – negative amortization.

The most common of these were Option Adjustable-Rate Mortgages, sometimes referred to as “pick-a-payment.” With these, the borrower could opt for a monthly payment that was less than the underlying interest charges, digging themselves further into debt as time went on.

“The Pay Option ARM had an adjustable interest rate, so while the borrower knew that they could make a tiny payment each month, there was the possibility that their interest rate would rise and the balance on their principal would increase even faster,” said Sam DeBord, a managing broker with SeattleHome.com in Washington state.

DeBord described Option ARMs as “the ultimate boom loan” and “a terrible loan for the average homeowner,” but a potentially good one for savvy investors to use for short-term projects where they wanted to minimize their cash outlay. He said he’s only written one such loan in his entire career, for a multi-million dollar property where the owner wanted to keep his assets free during a remodel and paid it off shortly afterwards.

“If the Neg-Am had only been offered to highly-qualified borrowers, it wouldn’t have been a bad product, but it was too complicated for the average homeowner and many made bad decisions in using it,” DeBord said.

After getting burned so badly on them in the downturn, it doesn’t appear that lenders will be offering these types of loans again any time soon.


ARMs are a type of loan that may seem to have disappeared after being wildly popular during the housing bubble years. In reality, they’re still very much alive, though much less common than they used to be. However, some of their variations that were very common during that time – such as the Option ARM discussed above – have disappeared to the point where they are pretty much extinct.

Though many people think of ARMs as an “exotic” type of mortgage, they’re actually one of the most traditional. In fact, in many countries they’re the main type of home loan. They’re called “adjustable rate” because they start out at one interest rate for a certain period of time, say 5 to 7 years, then adjust to a new rate based on current market conditions – a rate that could be significantly higher than the original one.

Demand for ARMs has shrunk dramatically since the crash, but not necessarily because people viewed them as inherently risky. It’s because the rates on fixed-rate loans dropped so low that ARMs had trouble competing.

“The ARMs didn’t dry up because they didn’t want to do them anymore. They dried up because fixed rates dropped below 4%,” said Charlie Walters, a Realtor with Walters Realty Group in Tempe, Ariz. “If rates go back to 6%, we’ll see ARMs and we’ll see a lot of them.”

What makes ARMs attractive is that their initial rate is usually lower than on an equivalent fixed-rate mortgage, allowing borrowers to minimize their monthly payments. But in recent years, the difference has been so small, most borrowers didn’t see it as worthwhile, particularly when they could lock in a long-term rate at historic lows.

Even so, ARMs still occupy a small slice of the market because of the advantages they offer a certain type of borrower.

“Over the last few years, we’re seeing a bit of the ARMs coming back, particularly 5/1 ARMs, for people who aren’t planning to stay in the home for more than a few years,” said TCU’s Whitman.

He said the loans are coming back in vogue for those borrowers because it doesn’t make sense for them to lock in a long-term loan. Instead, they can get an ARM whose initial term matches the length of time they expect to stay in the home and save a bit on interest.

Teaser Rates

What got people into trouble with ARMs wasn’t necessarily the fact the loans were adjustable, but some of the features that were often combined with them. One of the most common of these was the “teaser” rate, where borrowers would start out with a very low rate, but the loan would later reset to a much higher rate.

Because these tended to be sold to borrowers who were poor credit risks, they easily got into financial trouble when the “teaser” rate ended and their payments increased. But the banks made enough off the loans to offset the high default rate, at least while home values were still rising.

As an example, Walters said that if fixed-rate mortgages were carrying a rate of 6% for borrowers with good credit, lenders might bring in subprime borrowers with a teaser rate of 3-6%, but that might reset to 9% in a fairly short time. Perhaps 7% would default, but the banks made enough off the other 93% to make it worthwhile.

But that all changed once home prices began to fall and the default rate increased.

“The whole subprime market started melting down, the lenders starting losing money hand over fist, like wildfire,” Walters said. “It was like a switch flipped.”

Walters said the basic rule of lending is that if the reward outweighs the risk, the borrower gets the loan. It’s still that way today, he said.

“It’s just after the housing bubble burst and the meltdown, they just know those loans don’t perform any more,” he said. “The bottom line is, those things aren’t coming back, probably never.”

Balloon Mortgages

Somewhat akin to ARMs are balloon loans. These are where a borrower gets a loan at a low rate for a certain number of years, often seven, with payments based on a longer amortization, say 30 years. But at the end of the seven years the entire remaining balance comes due, hence the name balloon.

The idea is that borrowers would simply refinance the loan at that point. But when home values dropped, many found it impossible to refinance – and instead of simply facing a higher interest rate, they were stuck with having to pay off the entire loan.

Like ARMs, balloon mortgages tend to offer lower rates than comparable fixed-rate mortgages and for the same reason – the lender doesn’t have to worry about being saddled with a low-rate mortgage long-term if rates rise in the future. They’ve also fallen out of popularity for the same reason as ARMs – because rates on fixed-rate mortgages have been so low there’s not much advantage to them.

Balloon loans remain widely available, according to Patrick Palzkill, a real estate broker and mortgage originator with Beacon Rock Real Estate and Mortgage in Boston, Mass., but the current rate differential just doesn’t justify it.

“Those are still out there, but they’re just not practical right now, he said, noting that balloon loans work best in an environment where rates are likely to decline.

“No mortgage person worth their salt thinks rates are going to go down,” Palzkill said.

Truly Extinct?

As for truly extinct mortgage types, Palzkill doesn’t think there are truly that many of them. Risk is coming back into the market, he said, people want to borrow money and investors will lend it to them if they can make a profit.

“Things haven’t changed that much,” he said. Already, he said, there are tough credit hard money lenders coming back in the market who’ll offer a mortgage to someone with a 500 credit score if they’re willing to put 30% down and pay 7% interest with two points upfront.

“There’re sharks out there who will take that,” he said.

Image: Zoonar

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team