Home > Uncategorized > How Would You Like a 3-Day Work Week? Apparently, It’s Good for You

Comments 0 Comments
Advertiser Disclosure


If you loathe your long work week, rejoice: science has your back. A new study concluded that working more than 30 hours per week has a negative impact on cognitive functions, like reading and memory.

The study, which was published by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, is based on a survey of Australian workers that includes respondents’ performances on three exercises that measure cognitive ability. They test memory span, divided attention, visual scanning, motor speed, reading and crystallized intelligence. Researchers reviewed the results of nearly 6,500 respondents — 2,965 men and 3,502 women — ages 40 and older and analyzed how their working hours related to their cognitive ability scores.

The analysis revealed a work-week sweet spot, of sorts. Working between 25 and 30 hours per week can “have a positive impact on cognition for males,” the report says, and for women, that ideal range is 22 to 27 hours per week.

“After that, working hours have a negative impact on cognitive functioning,” the report says. “This indicates that the differences in working hours is an important factor for maintaining cognitive functioning in middle and older adults.” The researchers noted that the differences between men and women’s working hours are not statistically significant.

Assuming employers want a workforce made up of sharp, mentally productive human beings, it would make sense to instate a 25- or 30-hour work week, right? It certainly sounds nice, from a worker’s perspective, but it also seems like a far-fetched idea. The average full-time employee in the U.S. works 47 hours per week, according to 2014 Gallup data. Americans have a reputation as workaholics, not only because of the long hours we keep but also because of our tendency to not go on vacation, even when we get paid vacation days and know taking a break is good for our health. With that in mind, it seems likely we’ll forge ahead with our 40-hour-plus work weeks, despite the way it seems to pummel our brains.

But if you’re looking for a job that requires less of your time than your current job, remember to check your credit as part of your preparation for the job hunt. Some employers review applicants’ credit reports as part of the hiring process, so you’ll want to know what they’ll see if they do. You can get a free annual credit report from each of the major credit bureaus — Equifax, Experian and TransUnion — on AnnualCreditReport.com

Image: Yuri_Arcurs

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team