Home > Identity Theft and Scams > Is EZ Shield Check Fraud Protection Worth It?

Comments 78 Comments
Advertiser Disclosure

Disclaimer

I recently reordered checks online. I confess I have no loyalty when it comes to check printers. I just look for cheap checks, and as long as the site is secure, I take whatever deal I can find.

As I completed my order, I was offered EZ Shield fraud protection as an optional add-on for $1.95 per box. The service offered to reimburse me within 72 hours – and up to $25,000 – if my checks were misused by a crook.

$1.95 isn’t a lot of money so I would imagine it is a no-brainer for some customers. But being a cheapskate, I wondered whether I should pay for it. And being a financial writer, I decided to investigate.

 

While I am very familiar with the rules that protect consumers if their credit or debit cards are used fraudulently, I had no idea what happens when the same thing happens with checks. As it turns out, it wasn’t as easy as I thought to track this information down. I didn’t find the usual government fact sheet explaining my rights. So I dug a little deeper.

First, though, some background: EZ Shield promises to “expedite the payment(s) owed to Customers for the Reimbursable Items on terms for which Customer would later be reimbursed by the financial institution on which the subject checks were drawn.” (In other words, they offer to speed up reimbursement on fraudulent checks financial institutions are likely to reimburse customers for anyway.)

EZ Shield features two levels of services: “Assisted,” where an adviser will walk the consumer through the steps to get reimbursed, or ”Fully Managed,” where the customer signs a limited power of attorney and other documentation including a police report and fraud form. Copies of the canceled checks may be required as well. It covers three types of check fraud:

  • Forged signatures,
  • Forged endorsements, and
  • Altered checks

I tracked down Beau J. Hurtig, an attorney with Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. in Minneapolis who has represented banks in instances involving check fraud. He explained that fraudulent checks are covered by the Uniform Commercial Code Articles 3 and 4, and many of the details focus on establishing liability among the financial institutions involved.

“Typically the real fight in these cases is between the depository bank (where the payee deposited the check) and the drawee bank (the bank of the customer who wrote the check),” said Hurtig. Unless a consumer is somehow negligent – gives checks to someone, or doesn’t check their statements within 60 days of receiving them, for example – they are usually off the hook and it’s the banks that are left to fight over who is stuck with the bad check.

Pages: 1 2

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.



Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team