Home > Mortgages > Ohio AG Leads Class-Action Lawsuit Against Fannie Mae

Comments 3 Comments

MikeDeWine_OhioAGOhio Attorney General Mike DeWine said in Congress last week that the mortgage giant Fannie Mae is wasting millions of dollars of taxpayer money on an excessive legal defense for its former leaders.

“Simply put, Fannie Mae and its former executives have been using American taxpayer dollars to pay their highly compensated cadre of lawyers to over-lawyer their indefensible actions,” DeWine said in testimony before the Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee of the House Financial Services Committee. “It is wrong, it is unconscionable and I urge the committee and Congress to bring it to an end.”

[Consumer resource: How to Correct an Error on a Credit Report]

DeWine is the lead lawyer representing 29 million investors in a class-action lawsuit against Fannie Mae, three former executives and the companies accounting firm, KMPG. The suit accuses the defendants of consumer fraud. It’s been winding through the courts for six years – so long that DeWine is actually the third attorney general from Ohio to play the role as lead litigant.

In his testimony, DeWine described recent trial conferences in which 35 to 40 lawyers and paralegals representing Fannie Mae crammed into the judge’s chambers to discuss the case. The plaintiffs brought three.

Taxpayers foot the bill for both sides. The plaintiff’s lawyers are with DeWine’s office. Fannie Mae’s army of lawyers is paid by the federal government, which took ownership of the company in 2008. They have charged at least $132 million in legal fees since the case began.

“Fannie Mae and the executives whom it is indemnifying are using taxpayer resources to lawyer this case to death and delaying justice for those whom they defrauded in the first place more than six years ago, while simultaneously swindling every American taxpayer,” DeWine said.

[Featured products: Monitor your credit reports and scores]

Image courtesy www.ohioattorneygeneral.gov

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Juanita B. Thomas

    I too lost considerable funds buying and investing in a former Fannie Mae home. It was over appraised by some $10k by the mortgage lender on behalf of the seller and mortgage lender broker(an additional $4k-$1700 to broker and closing costs for seller entered on my side of contract). The lender recently had class action filed against them which we all know most of which went to the attorneys. It”s amazing how this lender posts the escrow sheet to fudge funds and extract frunds without justification, alleging all the time, it is a way to correct the payments. What are they doing that needs all that correction? that’s another question that remains unanswered.

  • http://outlookexpressorzoomtownemail George Mc Gonigle

    I lost 25 thousand dollars. How do I sign on as a party to the class action suit by the Ohio A.G.?

  • the gerald

    dewine has complained and whined everywhere about the lawering, but i have yet to see a summary of the case. i think it is just the dewine running for public office case.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team