Home > Managing Debt > Can a Credit Report Error Be Too Old to Fix?

Comments 1 Comment

Can a Credit Report Error be Too Old to Fix?A Credit.com reader recently wrote in with questions about errors on her credit report, and what to do when a creditor says they’ll remove them — and then they don’t.

The history:  I spoke to a creditor about two years ago (Oct 2010) when I was late with a payment because I had trouble making the payment on their website. I gave the customer service agent my bank info while on the phone so that he could mirror the steps I took to pay and he was unable to make the payment as well. It turns out that their system wasn’t accepting my bank’s routing number.  The agent credited all of the late fees and per my request, verbally agreed to remove the late status with the credit bureaus. I recently pulled my credit report and the late payment is still there. I called the creditor again today, spoke to a supervisor and was told they couldn’t help me. I was told that “by law” they could not alter the status of my late payment with the credit bureaus if it had been more than 12 months and that I would need to dispute the error through the three credit bureaus.

Second:  The 24 Month Payment History for this late payment has not been refreshed with one credit bureau since Oct 2010. Does that have much impact on my credit score and is there any benefit to requesting that they refresh the dates?

[Related Article: The First Thing You Must Do Before Paying Off Debt]

Free Credit Check & MonitoringDealing with credit reporting errors and trying to get them corrected is never a fun experience. It’s time-consuming and often, it can be downright frustrating. With that said, the supervisor’s claim that they could not make a change “by law” is completely untrue. There is no law that says they can’t correct or update the account information and send it to the credit reporting agencies — it doesn’t matter how long ago the error was originally reported.

The fact is, these companies furnish the data to the credit reporting agencies, which means they’re the only ones that have access to make changes to the data they report. Based on what you’ve explained, it’s more likely that the supervisor saw no proof or evidence that showed the payment was late due to a technical error and rather than argue the point, advised you to file a dispute directly with the credit reporting agencies.

Regarding the supervisor’s statement — under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, if a consumer disputes an error on their credit report, the lender is required by law to open an investigation to confirm whether or not the item in question is accurate. The creditor has 30 days to investigate the dispute and if they determine that it is in fact an error, they are legally obligated to correct the error so that it’s accurately reflected in your credit report.

[Credit Score Tool: Get your free credit score and report card from Credit.com]

When you file your dispute with the credit reporting agencies, be sure to include any documentation that would prove your case. Unfortunately, verbal promises are almost impossible to prove. In the future, if a creditor agrees to something verbally, always request to get it in writing so that you have proof. In your particular case, it’s important to clarify what constitutes a 30-day late payment. From a credit reporting standpoint, a 30-day late is technically any payment that is 1 to 30 days late.

However, even though lenders can technically report a 30-day late if you are as little as one day late on a payment, the large majority do not report a 30-day late payment until you reach the 31-day late mark. This means that even though there were technical difficulties on the issuer’s website, the payment was most likely already “technically” late. It doesn’t make the process any less frustrating, but when you dispute the late payment these are all factors that are taken into consideration by both the credit reporting agency and the data furnisher (the creditor/lender reporting the information).

I know this isn’t the answer you were hoping to hear, but the good news is that one 30-day late from two years ago will not have as much of an impact on your credit score as you might think — especially if it was an isolated, one-time incident. This is because credit scores place more emphasis on the past 24 months, which has already passed — the older it gets, the less impact it will have.

And one final clarification: From a credit scoring perspective, the date that matters is the date that the incident occurred — in this case October 2010. So updating the date of last activity, the date of last update, or “refreshing” or updating the date reported will have no impact on your credit score.

[Free Resource: Check your credit score and report card for free with Credit.com]

Image: iStockphoto

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team