Home > Personal Finance > My Bank Gave Away My $6,000: Here’s How They Fixed It

Comments 0 Comments

A peculiar transaction caught Blake Rasmussen’s attention when he checked his bank account online earlier this month.

He saw a withdrawal for $6,000 had been made at his local Wells Fargo branch, but he hadn’t made that withdrawal. A $50 deposit appeared, as well, which Rasmussen also didn’t make.

“I immediately called the fraud department,” he said. Rasmussen was told to reach out to the branch, located in Austin, Texas.

The withdrawal turned out to be a teller error — Rasmussen’s account number was used for another customer’s transaction, perhaps due to a copy-and-paste error.

“They told me, This is a mistake on our part; you’re going to get your money back,” Rasmussen said.

He discovered the problem on a Thursday and was told it would be corrected by Saturday or Monday. Monday morning, the bank manager called.

Rasmussen’s money was going to be fully refunded, but not until Friday.

“That’s when I got upset.”

Correcting the Bank Error

Wells Fargo issued a $6,000 memo credit to his account while they investigated the error. Commence the angry customer emails.

“I wrote an email to the branch manager saying ‘This is unacceptable,’” Rasmussen said. “‘You’re giving me fake money. I can’t do anything with it.’”

Helen Bow, a communications manager for Wells Fargo in Texas, said in an email that the memo credit is standard procedure while the bank verifies an error.

“The most important point to remember is that the customer was never in jeopardy of incurring overdraft fees,” she wrote. “We covered his account throughout the investigation.”

The bank manager responded to Rasmussen in a similar vein, saying that the bank needed to do its due diligence and make sure the error really was an error before placing a permanent credit in Rasmussen’s account.

Wells Fargo had already acknowledged its error — why couldn’t Rasmussen have his money back? He felt the memo credit did him no good. Frustrated, Rasmussen continued to press the bank manager. He took to Twitter: “Potentially looking for a new bank. Want something national. Any suggestions for alternatives for @wellsfargo?”

After another heated email, and in the midst of a Twitter exchange with @Ask_WellsFargo, a customer service account, Rasmussen saw his problem resolved.

Four business days after the initial complaint, his account was made whole.

Striking a Balance

Nessa Feddis, senior vice president of consumer protection and payments for the American Bankers Association, put the scenario in perspective:

“Obviously, banks have an innate interest in making sure that there are no errors. They’re in the business of making their customers happy. If the customer isn’t happy, they’ll leave the bank.” She continued: “But they also have to have procedures to make sure that neither the consumer or potential fraudsters or their own employees are conducting fraud.”

She said there is no industry standard on how these sorts of issues are resolved — procedures vary by bank, by customer and by elements of the problem. She also noted that errors concerning greater amounts of money require more care.

“I just didn’t understand how they could let someone walk out the door with my $6,000,” Rasmussen said. “Whether or not they’re able to adequately answer that will be a big part of my decision [to remain a Wells Fargo customer].”

Rasmussen has been a Wells Fargo customer for 15 years, and he has only had one other problem with the bank (a deposit that never hit his account — he showed a receipt and it was immediately fixed, he said).

Bow, the Wells Fargo communications manager, said the amount of time it takes to investigate and rectify an error varies.

“We — as all financial institutions — are allotted time to figure things out,” she wrote in an email, speaking generally about errors in customer accounts.  “It may be 30 minutes or five days. It depends on the circumstances.”

Feddis says no matter how hard a bank works to be error-free, it’s a balancing act.

“They want to get it right but it’s not always instantly clear,” she said. “Does it work 100% percent of the time — what does?”

Image: Brand X Pictures

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team