Home > Credit Cards > What to Do if an Authorized User Is Abusing Your Credit Card

Comments 0 Comments

The idea of adding an authorized user to a credit card account is often considered to be as risky as cosigning a loan: many advise not to do it. There’s always the lingering fear that an irresponsible individual could ruin your credit profile if you give him or her the benefit of the doubt. Unlike cosigning loans, however, there are ways to reduce the risk with an authorized user.

Because the card limit for an authorized user is shared with the primary cardmember, purchases from any card user will directly affect the spending ability of everyone else on the account.

If an authorized user spent $900 on a credit card account with a limit of $1,000, you would only be able to spend $100. Such a situation would prove to be a major inconvenience if you happened to need to use your credit card in an emergency. Additionally, a high balance also means that your credit score could take a dip.

Talking to authorized users about how they should use their cards (e.g., setting guidelines and noting that the card is only for emergencies) is always a recommended step before giving access to your credit line. However, they might not listen.

Restrict Spending Potential

When an authorized user appears to be abusing their access to your credit card, you should consider placing a spending limit.

Your credit card issuer may allow you to impose spending caps on authorized cards for the sole purpose of controlling the balance that the secondary user can accumulate.

For example, American Express allows primary card-members to place a cap of at least $200 to the maximum credit limit. Check with your card issuer about their policy.

Putting a spending limit will not affect the authorized user’s credit profile since the total shared credit limit will still appear on his or her credit reports.

Cut the Cord

If restricting an authorized user’s spending limit is not possible, then the last resort would be to remove the authorized user entirely. Again, this step will not have a negative effect on your credit profile.

To ensure that the authorized user is able to continue to build credit, he or she should think about applying for a credit card before you cut them loose — since the credit line they currently share with you can still be used to display creditworthiness.

In the event that the authorized user is not yet able to qualify for an unsecured credit card, then a secured credit card may be a viable option. (For many consumers, a secured credit card may have been a good alternative to authorized card access in the first place.)

Secured credit cards require an upfront cash deposit to act as collateral while cardmembers have to show that they’re capable of making monthly payments on time. Due to the low credit limits often placed on secured credit cards, borrowers are less likely to overspend and more likely to exhibit responsible financial behavior, which would establish a trustworthy credit profile.

The Non-Credit Route

When all credit-linked options have been exhausted, and someone still cannot show the capability to handle credit, then maybe this person is not yet ready to build credit. Instead, you may have to help this person build good financial habits first.

Joint checking accounts and prepaid debit cards are two ways that someone can learn to not spend more than they have. Both allow for spending limits on individual cards, which can actually serve as practice before the transition to authorized-user status on a credit card account.

Whether you’re a cardholder or an authorized user, it’s always important to monitor your credit. A free tool like Credit.com’s Credit Report Card can give you your score and a breakdown of which areas of your credit history need work. Building — and maintaining — good credit takes awareness and work.

Image: moodboard

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team