Home > Mortgages > 10 Areas Where Home Sellers Are Making Bank

Comments 0 Comments

It’s a good time to sell a home. Buyers are back to fighting over properties in hot markets and that means less time sellers need to wait around.

Realtor.com says homes stayed on the market 14 days less in March 2016 than March 2015, a dramatic drop. The number of homes listed has dropped, too, meaning more buyers fighting over fewer properties.

Of course, competition means also means higher prices, and ultimately more cash at closing for sellers. You might expect folks selling in real estate hotbeds like New York and California to post big gains after sales, but you’ll be surprised at places where sellers are averaging more than $50,000 in sale proceeds, according to data provided by RealtyTrac.

Check out these average gains:

  1. Washoe County, Nevada (Reno) — $77,500
  2. Yavapai County, Arizona (Prescott)— $76,980
  3. Deschutes County, Oregon (Bend)— $71,600
  4. Weld County, Colorado (Greeley)— $66,400
  5. Skagit County, Washington (Rural) — $66,900
  6. Anchorage, Alaska — $58,956
  7. Charleston, South Carolina— $57,000
  8. Davidson County, Tennessee (Nashville)— $52,000
  9. Baltimore County, Maryland — $50,198

To review, that means the average gain for a home seller In Baltimore County last month was more than $50,000.

Note, the gains cover all sales, whether owners held the property for 1 year or 40 years. Nationally, sellers owned their homes on average 7.67 years, RealtyTrac says. That means folks in Prescott, Reno, or Bend averaged about $10,000 gain annually — a tidy sum.

Moving down the average dollar gain list, you still find plenty of places where it was surprisingly good to be a seller in March. Here’s a few more:

  • Mohave County, Arizona (Lake Havasu City) — $43,251
  • Buncombe County, North Carolina (Asheville) — $39,750
  • Waukesha County, Wisconsin (Milwaukee) — $38,100
  • Ada County, Idaho (Boise City)— $35,183
  • York County, Pennsylvania — $35,000
  • Catawba County, North Carolina (Rural) — $33,000
  • Rockingham County, New Hampshire (Near Manchester) — $31,767

Of course, gains in America’s biggest cities were an order of magnitude larger, as you’d expect. In San Francisco County, the average gain was $473,000. In Santa Clara, $335,000. In New York City’s King Country, gains averaged $255,000. In Los Angeles County, a still-astounding $152,000.

“It’s absolutely a great time to sell, particularly in these markets that have seen strong price gains,” said Daren Blomquist, vice president of RealtyTrac.

It’s important to realize sellers often don’t see any of that money if they are moving into another home in the same area. Proceeds from the sale just get rolled over as a down payment on the new home. Still, those who move, or downsize, can realize dramatic (and often tax-free) gains. (If you’re planning on selling your current home to buy a new one, you should make sure your credit is in good shape before you apply for your new mortgage. You can check your credit scores for free on Credit.com to see where you stand.)

On a percentage basis, Washington D.C.-area sellers in Montgomery County (Bethesda) gained the most — a whopping 108%. San Francisco-area counties took up four of the top 10 percentage-gain slots, and three New York City metro-area counties made the top 10, also. But folks near Austin, Texas, did well, too, gaining 55% and placing 9th in the country.

It’s a bit of a surprise that D.C. and San Francisco landed atop that list, given that those markets that have cooled off a little – sale prices were actually down 2% in San Francisco in March. But here’s your explanation: Frisco prices fell following 47 consecutive months of increases.

“In those markets you have folks cashing out even as the market shows evidence of peaking,” Blomquist said. “I would suggest that folks selling now are likely timing the market quite well — whether intentionally or not.”

The Flip Side: Some Sellers Lose

Of course, not everyone is joining in the party. Americans in some communities are still losing money selling their homes. Sellers in Wayne, Michigan (near Detroit) saw their homes drop 75% in value, on average, from purchase to sale. Not far away in Saginaw, prices fell 22%. In rural Bell, Texas, prices fell 19%. Prices in two counties near Cleveland — Cuyahoga and Lorain — saw double-digit percent drops. And folks in eastern Pennsylvania — near Scranton and East Stroudsburg — also suffered double-digit losses, as did sellers in Harford County (Maryland, north of Baltimore) and Charles County, southeast of Washington D.C.

More on Mortgages & Homebuying:

Image: AzmanJaka

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team