Home > Auto Loans > Consumer Watchdog Announces Largest Discriminatory Auto Lending Case Ever

Comments 0 Comments

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced Friday the largest auto loan discrimination case to date, in which Ally Financial Inc. and Ally Bank has been ordered to pay $80 million in damages to 235,000 minority borrowers impacted by their discriminatory pricing system.

The enforcement action stems from an investigation started in 2012, through which the CFPB and the Department of Justice determined Ally’s auto loan interest rates were higher for African-American, Hispanic, and Asian and Pacific Islander borrowers than for non-Hispanic white borrowers of similar creditworthiness.

Ally is one of the nation’s largest indirect auto lenders, and this settlement takes issue with its dealer markup practices: Ally sets a risk-based interest rate for borrowers and then allows the dealers to charge a higher interest rate when closing the sale with the buyer. Between April 2011 and December 2013, Ally overcharged thousands of consumers for auto loans based on race and national origin, which is prohibited by the Equal Credit Opportunity Act.

“Too many consumers have had to pay more for their auto loans simply because of their race or other characteristics protected under the law,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray in a press call announcing the action. “Too often, these consumers do not know they are paying more or are simply unable to get recourse. Today’s action signals new attention to this serious problem.”

As is the case with most credit, auto loan interest rates are tied to a consumers’ credit scores, which indicate an individual’s likelihood of repaying debt, based on his or her credit history. A person’s credit report will show how many accounts he or she has in good standing, how often debt payments are made on time, how frequently that person applies for new credit and how much a person uses of his or her available credit. All these things carry different weight in credit scoring models (there are dozens of them), which creditors then use to help make lending decisions.

When shopping for new credit, whether it’s a car loan, credit card, mortgage or personal loan, it’s helpful to start with an idea of how you look to a lender and participate in the loan-application process as an informed consumer.

By looking at your credit scores, which you can do using free tools like the Credit Report Card, you can engage in a productive discussion with lenders about your credit history and how it impacts how much you pay for financial products. For instance, if you receive a high interest rate on an auto loan, it may be because of a poor payment history — or maybe you have a solid credit history, and you’ll need to ask your lender for an explanation. You should also pull free copies of your credit reports using AnnualCreditReport.com.

The bureau and DOJ also ordered Ally to pay $18 million to the CFPB’s civil penalty fund, which was established by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 to be used for payments to victims and consumer education and financial literacy programs.

“With this largest-ever settlement in an auto loan discrimination case, we are taking a firm stand against discrimination in a critical lending market,” said Attorney General Eric Holder, in a news release announcing the action. “It will enable the Justice Department and the CFPB to work closely with Ally and others to prevent discriminatory practices in the future. And it will reinforce our determination to respond aggressively to discrimination in America’s lending markets – wherever it is found.”

Image: evp82

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team