The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
The $7.25 billion proposed settlement between Visa and MasterCard, and a large number of retail groups and chains, has drawn significant opposition from many well-known national stores, and as such, a group of 17 retailers recently filed a new suit in a New York court over the case, according to a report from Bloomberg Businessweek. The suit alleges that these two payment processing giants illegally hindered competition in the interchange fee market by imposing nearly identical rules for how they could charge stores for accepting these payments.
Further, it claims that the settlement in question from the previous suit would give Visa and MasterCard too much freedom to increase rates to the anti-competitive levels once again in the future, the report said. This is because it prevents any participants in the settlement from suing the companies over these fees going forward.
“Plaintiffs have paid and continue to pay significantly higher costs to accept Visa-branded and MasterCard-branded credit and debit cards than they would if the banks issuing such cards competed for merchant acceptance,” lawyers for the retailers said in the complaint, according to the news agency.
Participants in the suit itself include Target, Macy’s, TJX, Kohl’s, Staples, J.C. Penney, Office Depot, L Brands, Office Max, Big Lots Stores, Abercrombie and Fitch, Ascena Retail Group, Saks, Bon-Ton Stores, Chico’s FAS, Luxottica Group, and American Signature, the report said. This is in addition to a number of other major retailers, including Walmart and Costco, who said they will opt out of the settlement and may file their own suits in the future.
Part of the settlement, which drew particular ire from consumer groups, allowed companies participating in it to charge customers additional fees to help cover the cost of paying these interchange fees levied by Visa and MasterCard. However, experts noted that few stores would actually be able to do so, because agreements with other payment processors, like American Express, would not allow them to apply these costs. Moreover, there was also a feeling that consumers would simply balk at these added charges.
Image: iStockphoto
April 9, 2024
Credit Cards
October 21, 2020
Credit Cards
August 3, 2020
Credit Cards