The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
The federal watchdog agency intended to help consumers find more protections from potentially harmful financial practices has largely been helpful in better informing borrowers of their various obligations, but an official whose job it is to provide oversight for the organization itself says more can be done.
If the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau had one overarching problem in its first year of full regulatory power, it was that in many cases its constituents may not have been given enough of an understanding about the various processes it has in place to protect them, according to the first annual report from Wendy Kamenshine, the agency’s ombudsman. Her office began operations some 10 months ago, and in that time received 775 inquiries from consumers, business people, lawyers, the media, lawmakers and government employees. In all, 80 percent of these submissions came from individual borrowers.
Of those inquiries, about 40 percent were related to the ways in which the agency deals with consumers’ complaints, the report said. Most were generally related to a lack of understanding they had about the process through which their filings went, and, therefore, the ombudsman’s office recommended that the CFPB can do more to clarify these situations so that borrowers have a more complete understanding of how their complaints are handled. For instance, some consumers said they did not understand the timeframes with which they were dealing once they submitted a complaint, such as how long it would take to review, or issue a judgment, and also that they did not know what to expect from each step.
One of the ways in which the ombudsman recommended greater clarity to the complaint process is by making sure to share more information with the public through various channels, the report said. Further, it needs to do a better job in giving transparency to when exactly the agency can and cannot help consumers with the complaints they might have about bank and nonbank financial institutions.
The CFPB has wielded full regulatory power over many lenders and other organizations involved in the financial system for more than a year, but is still expanding its purview to make sure that consumers are protected in as many parts of the various financial aspects of their lives as possible.
Image: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, via Flickr
March 11, 2021
Personal Finance
March 1, 2021
Personal Finance
February 18, 2021
Personal Finance