The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
“A lot of people think the lobbying stops once a bill goes into law, but that is definitely not the case with Dodd-Frank,” says Michael Beckel, spokesman for the center. “There’s a lot of deep-pocketed interests that are trying to slow down or thwart or repeal completely the regulations that were passed last year.”
That total includes all industries of the financial and consumer credit sector, including $9 million from credit companies, $14 million from real estate, $16 million from commercial banks, $25 million from securities and investment houses, and $40 million from insurance companies, the center found.
Lobbyists don’t have to write on their disclosure forms what exactly they’re lobbying about. But the fact that Dodd-Frank remains a major focus is seen in the large shift that’s taken place recently. When Dodd-Frank was still being debated in Congress, most of the $480 million that financial services companies and their trade associations spent on lobbying efforts was directed at wooing members of Congress.
But Dodd-Frank left sweeping sections of new financial rules to be determined by regulatory agencies. Which is why so far this year, lobbying efforts have shifted dramatically from Congress to the federal bureaucracy.
More lobbyists met with leaders of the Federal Reserve and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission in the first quarter of 2011 than in all of 2010, the center found.
“The regulatory agencies tasked with implementing the reforms—the Federal Reserve, the FDIC, the Commodities Futures Commission, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the SEC—all of these agencies are at pretty historic levels of being targeted by lobbyists,” Beckel says.
Meanwhile, organizations that support the reforms are several orders of magnitude smaller in terms of their lobbying heft. The Center for Responsible Lending spent $96,000 on lobbying in the first quarter. The Consumer Federation of America spent $10,000.
“The consumer groups that are pushing for these regulations are really outgunned in this fight,” says Beckel.
Image: Karan J, via Flickr.com
March 11, 2021
Personal Finance
March 1, 2021
Personal Finance
February 18, 2021
Personal Finance