The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
[Disclosure: Our partners are mentioned below.]
Three of the nation’s largest lenders now face two antitrust lawsuits related to charges of collusion.
American Express, Discover Financial Services and Citigroup are accused of colluding to force customers who brought complaints against them into arbitration rather than class action suits, according to a report from Reuters. The lawsuit claims the point of these activities was to create more costs for consumers — given that arbitration is more expensive to pursue than a traditional lawsuit — and therefore deter consumers from going forward with their complaints. Further, there is a greater burden of proof on complainants in the arbitration process than the court system.
“If the average consumer was aware of the costs they’d have to bear in arbitration, they wouldn’t do it,” lead plaintiff Robert Ross said in response to questioning by a lawyer for American Express, Rowan Wilson of Cravath, Swaine & Moore, according to the news agency.
[Free Resource: Check your credit score and report card for free before applying for a credit card]
These suits were first filed in 2004 and 2005, and no damages are being sought, the report said. Instead, the plaintiffs want courts to force the lenders to remove arbitration as an option in their cardholder agreements.
For their part, the lenders contend that they all arrived at the decision to push arbitration and forbid class action independent of one another, the report said. Further, they note that the suits now facing them do not show harm or curb competition as defined by existing U.S. antitrust law.
In 2010, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Capital One and HSBC settled a similar suit against them by removing arbitration clauses for three and a half years, and paying plaintiffs’ lawyers $2.35 million in fees and expenses, the report said. Those settlements will expire later this year.
[Credit Cards: Research and compare credit cards at Credit.com]
Consumers often report incorrect data on their credit card bills and other statements to the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and these make up a large portion of complaints the agency hears every year.
Image: Andres Rueda, via Flickr
April 9, 2024
Credit Cards
October 21, 2020
Credit Cards
August 3, 2020
Credit Cards