The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
[UPDATE: Some offers mentioned below have expired and/or are no longer available on our site. You can view the current offers from our partners in our credit card marketplace. DISCLOSURE: Cards from our partners are mentioned below.]
Because of a private antitrust suit filed by several million businesses large and small against some of the nation’s biggest financial institutions, it’s believed that there could be a dramatic shift in the way companies pay to accept credit card transactions.
The suit, which is slated to go to trial later this year, was filed because merchants believe that Visa, MasterCard and the 13 of the biggest financial institutions in the country are keeping credit card interchange fees higher than they need to be, according to a report from CNBC. Some analysts say that, instead of letting the case go before a judge, it could mean as much as hundreds of billions of dollars in settlements. This could be preferable to banks because some now believe that the judge would institute a limit on the amount payment processors charge for accepting credit card transactions, one as low as 0.5 percent of a purchase’s total value.
That’s even with the credit card transaction fee cap that’s in place in Australia, but still higher than the one allowed in the European Union, which stands at just 0.3 percent of the purchase value, the report said.
The new cap fee, if it were to be imposed, would be a significant decline from the current rates charged by payment processors, which averages between 1.75 and 2 percent of a purchase price, the report said. And analysts say that a 75 percent drop in these interchange fees would cost many of the nation’s credit card lenders billions of dollars annually on top of the significant hit they already took when the federal government imposed a limit on debit card transaction fees. That limit stands at 21 cents per purchase, rather than the average of 44 cents when the charges were allowed to be based on a percentage of the transaction’s value.
That rule, part of the Durbin Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Act, is what banks say led them to charge higher credit card interchange fees as a means of making up lost revenues, the report said.
Interchange fees are often built into prices for all customers, not just those paying with a debit or credit card. Retail industry representatives argue that businesses would be in a position to reduce prices if they were being charged less for accepting card purchases.
March 11, 2021
Personal Finance
March 1, 2021
Personal Finance
February 18, 2021
Personal Finance