The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
Durbin struck back with a letter blasting Dimon’s arguments that new regulations could force banks to abolish services like free checking accounts.
“There is no need for you to threaten your customers with higher fees when you and your bank are already making money hand-over-fist,” Durbin said in the letter, pointing out that Dimon received $20.8 million in salary and bonuses in 2010, and Chase made $17.4 billion in profit.
[Related articles: The Durbin Amendment]
Durbin’s letter was a defense of his amendment to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. It limits debit interchange fees that are set by card networks Visa and MasterCard from their current average of 44 cents to a maximum of 12 cents, but allows banks to set their own prices if they choose.
In a statement to Chase shareholders, Dimon called the Durbin amendment “counterproductive,” “price fixing at its worst.”
In his letter, Durbin retaliated by refuting Dimon’s major arguments against the cap. Dimon told Chase shareholders that the amendment “is an example of a policy that has little basis in fact or analysis.”
Actually, the rules are based on years of research by Congress and academics, Durbin said, which have found that Visa and MasterCard have a duopoly over the interchange market, allowing them to set high fees and pass them onto banks, while giving merchants and consumers no choice.
[Slide show: 11 Ways A Debt Collector May Be Breaking the Law]
The result, Durbin says: a system that encourages fraud, and encourages banks to operate inefficiently.
“Your industry is used to getting its way with many members of Congress and with your regulators, and my amendment and the Federal Reserve’s draft regulations were not written the way you wanted,” Durbin wrote. “The American people deserve to know the real story about the interchange fee system and the ways that banks in general—and Chase in particular—have abused that system.”
The Fed’s rules for implementing the Durbin amendment were scheduled to take effect this month. But after receiving a mountain of mail on the subject, the agency informed Congress it won’t be able to weigh all the comments in time to meet the deadline. A new proposal is expected sometime this summer.
Image: Center for American Progress Action Fund, via Flickr.com
March 11, 2021
Personal Finance
March 1, 2021
Personal Finance
February 18, 2021
Personal Finance