Home > Personal Finance > The Most DisCREDITed Ideas of 2011

Comments 0 Comments

Welcome to the first annual “Most DisCREDITed Awards.” In a bad-economy year full of silly laws, mortgage miseries, political gaffes, Hatfield-McCoy feuding, credit downgrades, mysteriously rising prices, fee gouging of every description, and art-project political campaigns—whew(!)—I thought you might like a guide to help you to weed out the ridiculous from the truly tragic. So what follows are the awards for the worst ideas, policies and personalities of 2011.

Most DisCREDITed Tax Reform Idea

9-9-9 is the hands-down winner. Of course the plan had one major advantage: It was, like its creator, very simple. Everyone could understand a 9% personal income tax rate, a 9% corporate tax rate, and a 9% federal sales tax rate. Everyone could understand the credibility lent to it by the fact that it was plagiarized from a very popular computer game (remember SimCity?). Best of all, everyone could understand that in the world from which Herman Cain emerged, presidential candidates would be expected to be able to quote something like a computer game or a Pokémon movie, instead of, say, Shakespeare. It’s probably not worth rehashing the wildly destructive effects of implementing such a plan here; let’s just say that most people don’t come from the same planet as Mr. Cain. In fairness, however, maybe given his interplanetary origins he was just speaking a different language. Perhaps what he really meant was “nein, nein, nein!”

Most DisCREDITed Election Campaign Policy Meant to Be Taken Seriously

There were many possibilities in this category, but ultimately we had to go with Mitt Romney’s idea of letting the home foreclosure epidemic “run its course.” Right now there are about 1.5 million homes going through that foreclosure process; there are about 3.5 million more homeowners who are significantly delinquent in their monthly mortgage payments; and there are about 10 million homes that cannot be refinanced because they are worth less than their existing mortgage debt, with those 10 million homeowners in varying stages of distress. If we let the foreclosure process run its course, we might just find ourselves in a situation every bit as bad as the nadir of the Great Depression, and we may create a problem of homelessness and despair rivaling a sub-Saharan civil war in its scope. Luckily for Mr. Romney, a dozen states have passed laws meant to disenfranchise the homeless, among others, so at least the victims of today’s real estate market may not be able to vote come November.

Most DisCREDITed Financial Institution Initiative

Another easy choice, although one that cannot be ascribed to a single institution. In the middle of 2011 came a cascade of new fees from banks; chief among these was the heinous fee for debit card usage. In many—but not all—cases the new fees were insidiously small-sounding, but they managed to create a hue and cry from all quarters. People switched banks, credit unions were flooded, and petitions were signed. Everyone seemed particularly outraged that banks had the cheek to charge people for accessing their own money through a card and a system of machines whose use had been encouraged by the banks for years. Adding insult to injury was the fact that the banks that had been bailed out in 2008 and 2009 seemed to be very profitable by 2011; hence the truffle-like search for new fees struck a very sensitive chord in many consumers around the country. The banks argued that the Durbin amendment to the Dodd Frank act, which drastically reduced fees paid for debit card usage by merchants, forced the banks to seek their profits by new means. Irrespective of the merits of their position, the consumer reaction was so pronounced that eventually most banks chose to abandon the debit card fee. Someone learned a lesson from this—it’s just not clear who.

Most DisCREDITed Budget Reform Plan

Paul Ryan’s budget takes the cake in this category, and eats it too. “We need to get rid of all these accounting tricks, all these budget gimmicks, and we’ve got to attack the drivers of our debt,” said Ryan very earnestly, reminiscent of Our Gang’s Alfalfa without the cowlick. However, upon a not very close examination it became completely obvious that Ryan’s budget was itself filled with accounting tricks and budget gimmicks, some supplied by the conservative Heritage Foundation and others resulting from blatant mischaracterization of Congressional Budget Office assessments. Worse, instead of attacking the drivers of the debt, it seemed to mostly attack drivers of postal trucks, by more or less eliminating Social Security and Medicare, as they have been understood for generations, for people who are today under 55 years of age. Ryan’s budget became laughable, like the 1928 Kellogg-Briand Pact (which purported to outlaw war as an instrument of national policy), only faster. Even Newt Gingrich, in a rare burst of candor, referred to it as “right-wing social engineering.” In any case by the end of the year, the Ryan being talked about most was an NFL quarterback, not a congressman from Wisconsin.

Most DisCREDITed Former Speaker of the House

Okay, okay, it’s Newt. John Boehner will have to wait for next year’s list.

Newt seemed lost after debunking the Ryan budget, and then a shoo-in after the debates. Ultimately, he was rebuffed for some unforgiveable sins, like appearing with Nancy Pelosi and acknowledging the existence of a global warming problem, or having enough money to have a large account at Tiffany & Co., but not enough to do saturation negative advertising in the campaign. The facts of his colorful marriage history and ethics problems didn’t seem to have much impact. This may be probative of the idea that the definition of “sin” was modified a bit in 2011, at least among likely Republican primary voters.

And finally…

Most DisCREDITed 222-year-old Idea


Image: Blind Hen, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team