The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
There has been much discussion in recent months about the coming increase in interest rates on federal student loans, and lawmakers’ attempts to keep that jump from happening have largely stalled.
Last week, two more attempts on the part of Republicans and Democrats in the U.S. Senate to freeze the interest rates on federally-issued student loans were stalled because lawmakers could not hit the 60-vote threshold that guaranteed the bills would pass, according to a report from the Washington Post. These problems are being caused because the two parties have been unable to agree on how to pay for the additional $6 billion loan subsidies that would accompany the rate freeze.
Leaders on both sides of the aisle would prefer to extend the current student loan interest rates for at least the next year, but there has — perhaps not surprisingly — been a considerable amount of disagreement over how to do it, the report said. This comes even as President Barack Obama and frontrunner for the GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney have both said that the rate needs to remain at its current level.
Democrats want to pay for the freeze — which would only last for a year — by ending a tax provision that allows some small business executives to collect their income as profits instead of wages, which helps them avoid payroll taxes, the report said. Meanwhile, Republicans want to subsidize the rate freeze by eliminating a fund to pay for preventative healthcare. The Democrat plan failed to pass thanks to a 51-43 vote, and the Republican proposal was overwhelmingly voted down 34-62.
If a bill cannot be passed to extend the current federal student loan interest rate of 3.4 percent, then it will double to 6.8 percent on July 1, and all loans taken out after that point will be more costly for students, the report said. However, federally-issued student loans that existed prior to July 1 would not have the higher rate applied.
These days, the average college student seeking a four-year degree owes tens of thousands of dollars on their student loans, which can make it difficult for many to achieve financial independence soon after graduation. Often, federal student loans aren’t enough to subsidize their education, and borrowers also have to seek money from private lenders as well.
Image: Sean Rakin, via Flickr
August 26, 2020
Student Loans
August 4, 2020
Student Loans
July 31, 2020
Student Loans