Home > Credit Cards > What Does the Debit Card Fee Cap Mean for You? An Inside Look.

Comments 1 Comment

The average small business will save $1,000 a year thanks to new limits on debit card swipe fees, according to a new estimate by Robert Baldwin, president of Heartland Payment Systems. Small restaurants will save $2,000 a year.

Will those savings be passed on to consumers? Or will it be a wash, as banks hike their fees to make up lost revenue?

“I don’t know, and at this point I don’t think anyone really does,” says Baldwin, whose company processes debit and credit card transactions for small and mid-sized companies.

For people who own small businesses, however, the impact will be real and immediate.

“Most of our clients would say $2,000 is a big deal,” Baldwin says.

The changes are coming due to the Durbin Amendment, which Congress passed last summer to limit debit card swipe fees. Under rules proposed by the Federal Reserve, the fees would be capped at 12 cents per swipe, down from their current average of 44 cents.

Banks spent millions of dollars on a lobbying push to kill or postpone the amendment; big retailers spent millions more to defend it. Banks argued that the big cut in swipe fees would force them to increase all kinds of fees and stop offering free checking; Chase even experimented with $5 ATM fees in Illinois.

Merchants argued the debit card system is a duopoly in which Visa and MasterCard use their dominance to keep fees unnaturally high, forcing stores to hike prices and costing consumers billions of dollars extra every year.

“With the lobbying there were occasional truths being passed around,” Baldwin says. “But obviously a lot of falsehoods, too.”

The merchants won. After failing to get a supermajority in Congress needed to postpone the new rules for a year, banks will watch their debit swipe revenue drop precipitously when the amendment takes effect July 21.

[Related Article: Big Debit Card Changes Coming]

What does all this mean for consumers? That’s hard to say. Since big banks like Citi and Wells Fargo have the most checking accounts, they also issue the most debit cards. As their revenue from debit transactions drops, they will look elsewhere to recoup some of that income, perhaps even charging for debit card access, as Jamie Dimon, CEO of Chase bank, has said on numerous occasions.

But if big banks choose to charge for debit card access, they could be constrained by two factors. First, small banks and credit unions are not subject to the Durbin amendment, so their incomes won’t take much of a hit. If the big banks increase their fees too much, they could watch smaller competitors poach their customer base.

Second, Baldwin points out, debit card transactions are the only means that consumers access their money from which banks make money (as opposed to cash, checks, ATMs and human tellers, all which cost the banks money). Do banks really want to start charging for debit card use?

“It’s hard to imagine [charging for debit card access] will make sense because that will push people to other means of accessing cash that are more expensive for the bank,” Baldwin says.

How about price reductions at the checkout counter? The banking industry argued that retailers are preparing to pocket the billions of dollars they’re about to save on debit fees. Others aren’t so sure.

“On day one? Sure, Walgreens and CVS and all the other big chains are going to have a lot more money,” says Baldwin. “Will that last over six months? Eighteen months? I’m not so sure.”

The clock is ticking. The Fed has less than a month now to publish its final rule before the new law takes effect July 21. What does it really mean for consumers? Now that the dust is beginning to settle, Baldwin says the truthful answer is simple: No one knows for sure.

“It’s all an ecosystem,” Baldwin says. “It is going to, on average, raise some costs for banking services and, on average, reduce some costs for retail. And no one will ever be able to figure it out.”

[Related articles: The Durbin Amendment]

Image: Memphis CVB, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team