Home > Managing Debt > Court Halts Alleged Fake Debt Collector Calls from India

Comments 5 Comments

We’ve been warning consumers about fake overseas payday loan collection scams for a few years now. So it can be disheartening when we hear stories, like the one that was posted last week on our blog:

I received a recorded call at work that said I had written a bad check and would be served court papers…that day. The message then left a phone number to call to try to “settle” or arrange a payment plan. I got really scared and called the number. The lady said…they are middle man to recover past due pay day loans.

I don’t think I owe this debt, but I was so shaken that I did pay them a $50 payment, and set up a payment plan of $200 a month to pay a total of $960.00. She sent me an email receipt but it does not look legitimate to me. Their logo is weird, there is no address, and no website. She said it’s a loan with quick cash. I tried to google quick cash and nothing comes up.

I don’t want to keep paying them if this is a scam, and I guess the worst that could happen is to be served or have my check garnished? I just don’t like the fact that they are calling my work place. Should I call them back and ask them for their address, business license and for the original paperwork for the debt owed? I am not sure if this is a real collection agency. Please help!

Bogus collectors scare consumers into paying debts they either don’t owe, or paid off long ago. Because they have so much information about the consumer—details such as Social Security numbers, work addresses, and/or bank account numbers—the victim often pays up thinking it must be legit. And because these operations are often based overseas, it can be difficult, if not impossible, for regulators to stop them.

Another One Bites the Dust

That’s why it’s especially sweet to hear news like this released last week by the FTC, which reported:

A U.S. district court has halted an operation that the agency alleges collected phantom payday loan debts that consumers either didn’t owe to the defendants or didn’t owe at all. The defendants’ scheme involved more than 2.7 million calls to at least 600,000 different phone numbers nationwide, according to the FTC. In less than two years, they fraudulently collected more than $5.2 million from consumers, many of whom were strapped for cash and thought the money they were paying would be applied to loans they owed, according to FTC documents filed with the court.

According to the FTC, representatives of the company would pretend to be American law enforcement agents, using names like “Officer Mike Johnson.” Or they would claim to be calling from fake government agencies like the “Federal Crime Unit of the Department of Justice.” In reality, the callers would be placing calls from India. They would often wear their victims down with repeated calls and threats. One woman was told her children would be taken away if she didn’t pay.

The case, Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. Broadway Global Master Inc., also doing business as BGM, In-Arabia Solutions Inc., and Kirit Patel, Defendants, was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.

In the public announcement, the FTC thanked the Better Business Bureau for its assistance in this case. And guess what that means? Complaints from consumers who were getting these calls helped to stop the operation. So if you are getting threatening calls like this, don’t be afraid to report them to the Federal Trade Commission and the Better Business Bureau. While the FTC may not be able to help you personally, they may be able to go after companies that generate multiple complaints from consumers.

Don’t Be a Debt Collection Scam Victim

Keep in mind that legitimate debt collectors are required under federal law to:

  1. Send written confirmation of a debt within three days of initial contact and, if the consumer disputes or questions the debt, to verify it.
  2. Stop calling debtors at work if they tell them to stop.
  3. Avoid threatening consumers with legal action they cannot take or don’t intend to take. Debt collectors generally can’t have debtors arrested for failing to pay debts.

NOTE: The Commission files a complaint when it has reason to believe that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The complaint is not a finding or ruling that the defendant has actually violated the law.

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Ray Francis

    I’m sorry but the court hasn’t stopped anything, they never shut down they just changed numbers and keep making calls. I get calls every other day.

  • Daniel Smith

    giving you information about debt collection scam in India at pune city…
    Don’t pay any amount, their hotline division is 877-514-6721 and their fax no is 212-202-3838……


  • Pingback: Despite Attention, Payday Scammers Keep Calling |()

  • Yadira Lorduy

    Yes I have received these kind of calls for the last three moths. Have called the police but there is nothing that they can do at the moment, but was advise to record all info and messages. These are some of the numbers I have received calls from:

    These are the names they use
    Gina Dwight
    Michael Clark
    David Miller

    I really hope that someone can do something about it.


    Thanks to Mrs Gerri for your response to my recent post last week. However the real issue was that these people would use fake identities/American names and telephone numbers but I know it’s the same person/people because of their accents.However 2 weeks ago I saw that the FTC has finally shut off the organization possibly responsible for these barrage of harassment phone calls. Although an injunction has been filed against them could the person/people behind this organization be questioned about what they know and who all is/are involved?.

    • http://www.Credit.com Gerri

      Yes, let’s hope that the FTC actions help send a message to to others that are doing the same thing.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team