Home > News > Elizabeth Warren’s Student Loan Bill Is Dead, But There’s Still Hope for Borrowers

Comments 0 Comments

The Bank on Students Emergency Loan Refinancing Act is dead.

We can debate all we like the wisdom of proposing legislation that calls for additional taxation on consumers rather than allocating a portion of the excess revenues from student loans (an exceedingly profitable and, arguably, perpetually sustainable enterprise).

In the meantime, here’s what can and should be done by the government—without the need for congressional approval—and by consumers who’ve once again been left on the side of the road without a way home.

What the Government Can Do

The administration can direct the Department of Education to disclose the terms and conditions of its student loan-servicing agreements. Why is that important? Because the problem isn’t just the amount of debt that consumer learners have undertaken, it’s the manner in which their loans are being administered by subcontractors and overseen by the department. (According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, many borrowers continue to report difficulties with their student-loan servicers.)

To that end, performance measurements for servicers should be sharpened and special care taken to frustrate those entities’ attempts at gaming the system. For example, loans that have only been temporarily remedied (that is, put into deferment or forbearance) should continue to be noted in the servicing reports that are submitted to the Education Department, and the subsequent performance of those that have been permanently restructured or modified should be monitored as a discrete class. By reporting the figures more accurately, everyone can have a clearer picture of what percentage of student loans are in trouble.

The ED should also require that every single borrower is made aware of the various relief programs that are in place—not just those who are having difficulties or whom department officials believe are likely to experience that in the future. It’s been my experience that the most effective way to communicate important information to debtors is via correspondences they are most likely to read: the ones that contain their monthly invoices.

The president can also broaden the executive actions he recently took. In particular, the latest rendition of the government’s relief programs should be made available to all government-backed loan borrowers, whether or not the loans were previously consolidated, incorporated into precursor relief programs or, even, if the borrower is not now current with his or her monthly payments. Doing so will ensure that help is given to those most in need of it.

As important, the administration should direct the ED to require its subcontracted servicers to apply all the installment payments it receives in a specific order: first to principal, then to interest and, thereafter, to any unpaid fees. And any remaining funds from a payment—in all cases—should automatically be applied against the principal so that it’s no longer left to borrowers to direct an action that’s in their own financial interest.

What Borrowers Can Do

There are four things that borrowers should do as well.

Educate yourself. Know your rights when it comes to the billing and collections of your debts, and stay current on the latest relief developments. The ED’s student loan site can help with that. So, too, can the Consumer Financial Bureau and Federal Trade Commission sites with regard to the Fair Credit Billing and Fair Debt Collection Practices acts.

Put it in writing. Formalize your verbal directives and grievances.

Be relentless. If your issue is not being resolved to your satisfaction, elevate it to as many higher levels as you must until it is.

Raise your voice. Demand action on the preceding and file loan-servicing complaints with your congressional representatives. Also alert the agencies that regulate student-loan activity, particularly the CFPB, which maintains a portal that’s easy to use.

More on Student Loans:

Image: Elnur Amikishiyev

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team