Home > Uncategorized > Stop Complaining: Homes Are Way Bigger Than They Were 100 Years Ago

Comments 0 Comments

It may feel like you’re short on space at home. After all, you had to rent a storage unit to keep all the items that don’t fit in your place. But a new study indicates we have very little to complain about in terms of how much space our homes actually have.

“U.S. homes have shown a steady and quite remarkable rate of growth in size over the past 100 years,” according to the study, conducted by real estate information site PropertyShark. “The average new home in America, be it condo or house, now spreads over 2,430 square feet.”

The study, which set out to analyze the evolution of new home sizes for each decade since 1910 in 32 of the largest U.S. cities, found that homes built in the last six years are 74% larger than those built in the 1910s. People have a lot more personal space now, too, as the average household has decreased from 4.5 to 2.5 people. That gives each person 211% more living space in those new homes.

The cities bucking the trend and building even larger homes are San Antonio; Orlando, Florida; and Nashville, Tennessee.

“All of these can boast a median home that spreads over more than 2,600 square feet, a generous space by any account,” according to the study. Homes built in San Antonio and Dallas are virtually mansions compared to a century ago — about twice as large, the study reports.

Boston is the city with the smallest new homes, only spanning an average of 909 square feet. The next smallest cities were San Francisco, at an average of 1150 square feet, and Miami, at 1,179 square feet.


To establish this list, PropertyShark looked at the square footage for all single-family nomes, condos and co-ops built in each of the 32 cities during each decade. This was limited to the city limits and was gathered from public sources, except in Chicago and Austin, where researchers used square footage found in for sale listings. All information represents the median value and national averages used all 50 states.

But, It Still Feels Small

Despite what this study shows, you may still feel like you need a bigger home. If that’s the case, it’s a good idea to save as much cash as you can for a down payment so you’re not nagged by a high monthly mortgage for longer than necessary. It’s also prudent to get your credit score into great shape before applying for a mortgage, because doing so may help you land a lower interest rate. (To get an idea of where your credit currently stands, you can see two of your credit scores for free, updated every 14 days, on Credit.com.) And, as you search for a new home, you can use this tool to help you determine how much home you can afford.

Image: monkeybusinessimages

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team