The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
Credit scores and the confusion they cause have once again stepped into the national spotlight with the release last week of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) Analysis of Differences between Consumer and Creditor-Purchased Credit Scores, as part of the Dodd-Frank Act requirement that the CFPB compare credit scores sold to creditors and those sold to consumers to determine whether differences between those scores put consumers at a disadvantage.
The study reported that as much as 73%-80% of the time, an “educational” score obtained from one of the many consumer websites is likely to place the consumer within the same “credit-quality category” as a creditor-purchased score – many of which are not available to consumers. While many reacted to the report with surprise that up to one in four scores for consumers are significantly different than the ones lenders see, some of us who have advocated for years for more score disclosure, were surprised that the scoring models were that accurate. Such results indicate a strong correlation (.90 out of a possible one) between the educational and creditor-purchased scores.
While not necessarily the intent of the CFPB study, these rather unexpected results reveal that there just may be too much emphasis being placed on credit scores nowadays, while the underlying credit report information and score factors that accompany most credit scores – both educational and lender-purchases – can be just as important, or more so, than matching the three-digit number a lender may be using.
With a goal of getting past credit scores by refocusing on credit report accuracy and using score factors for improvement, what follows is a list of five reasons why your score may not matter all that much anyway:
Consumer access to credit scores over the past decade has helped consumers become more savvy and empowered than ever. Now it may be time to reassess the importance of credit scores as the main consumer empowerment tool, and instead refocus on the credit report, score factors and managing credit responsibly.
Image: andymangold, via Flickr
March 7, 2023
Credit Score
January 4, 2021
Credit Score
September 29, 2020
Credit Score