Home > Identity Theft > A 17-Year ID Theft Saga Finally Ends

Comments 1 Comment

17-year identity theft saga finally endsFor those who say that identity theft isn’t a big deal, that it can generally be resolved by making a few phone calls to banks and credit card companies when your credit card is compromised or new accounts opened in your name, to quote Rod Serling, “Submitted for your consideration” the case of a Florida grandfather of nine, Lawrence E. Smith.

ABC News‘ Jessica Hopper reports that Mr. Smith filed for a $704 tax refund in 2004, which never came. Instead, it was sent to California to pay for a fraud charge he never knew existed. He suddenly had a very uneasy feeling and subsequently learned that in 2001, he was ticketed for driving a purple Camaro (imagine the shock of learning that someone accused you of driving a purple vehicle) too fast. In 2006 he was arrested and served 8 days in jail, charged with a crime he hadn’t committed. He has been billed over $300,000 by Medicare, haunted by creditors and almost had his long-standing (40 years) driver’s license suspended in Florida over a bill from the California Highway Patrol for a vehicular offenses he couldn’t have committed because he wasn’t there.


Joseph Kidd was arrested and fingerprinted in California for an “unspecified, non-violent crime” in 1993 under the alias “Lawrence E. Smith.” On that day, the real Lawrence E. Smith, who lives in Lehigh Acres, Fla., officially became a resident of the identity theft Twilight Zone.

Reports show that Kidd went so far as to acquire a birth certificate, marriage license and a driver’s license in the victim’s name. This isn’t a simple case of identity theft, it’s an identity takeover. Using Smith as his alias, Kidd even got married in 2007.

[Related: The Javelin Conundrum: Making Sense of the Latest Identity Theft Numbers]

In July of 2006, there was a nationwide manhunt for Kidd, who had violated his parole and was hiding in plain sight under the name “Lawrence E. Smith.” Florida police apparently thought the real Larry Smith was their man and booked him into an Orlando jail.

Smith has no recollection of ever meeting Joe Kidd and is haunted by the question of why he won the Kidd identity lottery. “I had no idea what was going on. I kept telling them it wasn’t me,” Smith, 67, told ABC News. “This one police officer in the prison said, ‘This prison is full of people that didn’t do it’ and that was the end of it,” Smith said.

Smith’s wife, panicked and worried that at any moment her husband would be extradited to California, got involved and began calling authorities to try and free her husband. “I spent eight days in jail in 2006 and my wife was on the phone 24-7 saying that it’s not me,” Smith told ABC News. Smith’s wife pulled records of her husband’s paycheck stubs where he was working when the crimes occurred, proving that it would have been physically impossible for him to be in two places at once.

Luckily, the Smiths were able to convince Florida authorities that he wasn’t the Larry Smith they sought. Police later found Kidd in Arkansas where he was then extradited to California.

Unfortunately for Larry Smith, law enforcement officials in California botched the arrest and instead of making things right and correcting the error, rebooked Kidd as “Lawrence E. Smith.” Kidd served time in prison for his parole violation and when released, he was given a parole ID card with – are you ready for this one? – Lawrence E. Smith’s name on it.

17-Year ID Theft Saga (cont.) »

Pages: 1 2

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • http://www.identitytheftprotection.org/ Edward

    It is very important to keep your personal information safely. Do not let other people get these information because they might use it and pretend as you. It’s good to hear that these fraudulent people were caught.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team