The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
This landmark law builds upon and extends reforms negotiated in the recent national mortgage settlement between 49 states and the nation’s 5 largest loan servicers, a case brought over the practice of “robosigning” documents: Ally/GMAC, Bank of America, Citi, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo. But unlike that settlement, this new legislation applies to all banks, although those that process fewer than 175 foreclosures a year would be exempt from some procedural requirements.
[Credit Score Tool: Get your free credit score and report card from Credit.com]
The Homeowner Bill of Rights takes effect Jan. 1, 2013, and imposes the following requirements on lenders and loan servicers:
Consumer advocate critics of the bill have charged that:
[Related Article: Another Good Mortgage Refi Program Gets Its Wings Clipped?]
While most smaller banks and credit unions remained neutral, opposition to the Homeowner Bill of Rights was mounted by the large banks, the California Chamber of Commerce, title companies, real estate agents, trustees and securities industry representatives.
Rodney K. Brown, president and CEO of the California Bankers Association, stated in a response to a recent Sacramento Bee editorial: “Our industry cannot support legislation that promotes meritless litigation, particularly in an environment where our court system is already overburdened, that will ultimately have no impact on the underlying financial condition of the borrower who cannot afford to stay in their home.” However, Brown agreed with some of the bill’s provisions, such as borrowers being entitled to an answer regarding their loan modification before being foreclosed upon and eligible loan modification applicants having a consistent point-of-contact.
Will other states follow California’s lead by enacting similar homeowner protection legislation? While perhaps a little too early to tell, if this victory for troubled California homeowners last week is any indication, the odds are looking better and better that some relief is on the horizon.
[Featured Products: Research and Compare Mortgage Rates at Credit.com]
Image: Robert Conrad Photography, via Flickr
December 13, 2023
Mortgages