The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
The number of people impacted by data breaches continues to grow, and California is no exception, where millions of people had their personal information exposed in breaches last year alone.
In 2012, some 2.5 million state residents had sensitive personal or financial information exposed in just 131 data breaches reported to the government, according to a new study from the office of Attorney General Kamala Harris. However, if proper safeguards had been in place where those incidents took place, they could have prevented the exposure of data of 1.4 million people (who were affected by 28 percent of the breaches).
These findings are consistent with what security experts have been seeing across the board.
“Encryption is the often the critical difference between secure information and compromised information put at risk.” says Brian McGinley, a security expert and CEO of Identity Theft 911 Consulting. He adds that today’s encryption programs are also easily implemented, unlike programs in the past.
McGinley says that any type of organization that collects personal data — commercial, financial services, education, healthcare, utilities and government entities alike — is at risk for a data breach.
In all, the average breach exposed about 22,500 people, but median incidents only affected about 2,500 people, due in large part to the fact that five of them each exposed 100,000 or more consumers. More than half of all breaches in 2012 exposed consumers’ Social Security numbers, and about the same number were caused by hacking attacks. The other 45 percent were the result of mistakes or a failure to put proper security measures into place.
“Data breaches are a serious threat to individuals’ privacy, finances and even personal security,” Harris said. “Companies and government agencies must do more to protect people by protecting data.”
Interestingly, the retail industry was responsible for the largest number of breaches of any sector, the report said. It suffered 34 breaches, or slightly more than a quarter of them. However, the finance and insurance industry wasn’t far behind at 30, or 23 percent of these occurrences.
Whenever a person’s sensitive data is exposed in a breach, they should take the time to look over all their financial documents, including their credit reports, as a means of determining whether they have become the victims of identity theft following the incident.
Image: iStockphoto
October 19, 2023
Identity Theft and Scams
May 17, 2022
Identity Theft and Scams
May 20, 2021
Identity Theft and Scams