The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
Created by large banks, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and others in the mortgage lending industry, the MERS registry allows institutions to exchange loan ownership without recording transfers with county Recorders of Deeds offices. In cases where a MERS member owns the note promising repayment, MERS acts as the lender’s nominee and remains the mortgagee of record, BusinessWeek explains.
[Article: Current on the Mortgage, but Delinquent on Property Taxes]
Biden’s office alleges that the database makes it difficult for consumers to recognize or challenge inaccuracies, and “hampers the ability of borrowers to seek out the owner of their loan to pursue loan modifications or other loss mitigation relief.”
Biden’s office also alleges that the system’s unreliability and frequent inaccuracy often results in MERS being unaware of the identity of its proper principal. “Where the name of the owner of the mortgage loan recorded in the MERS System does not reflect the true owner, any action MERS takes on behalf of the purported owner is without authority,” according to the AG’s statement.
[Featured Tool: Get your free Credit Report Card from Credit.com]
Merscorp responded with a statement from Janis Smith, Vice President for Corporate Communications. The company describes its business model as “straightforward and transparent” and argues that there is “no merit” to the Delaware AG’s deceptive practices claims. Likewise, “we refute claims that use of the MERS System caused confusion to borrowers or any other participants in the mortgage finance system,” according to the statement.
The company adds that borrowers’ customer relationships lie with loan servicers, and that its system provides homeowners with free access to their loan servicer at all times.
According to Dow Jones Newswires, previous lawsuits have resulted in some legal victories for MERS and some for its critics. The Delaware AG seeks a civil penalty of $10,000 and restitution for every willful violation of state deceptive-trade-practices act. Additionally, it “seeks to stop MERS from initiating foreclosure actions in the state or taking any actions on Delaware-registered mortgages until it has audited them for accuracy and it has improved transparency,” Dow Jones Newswires reports.
[Featured Product: Shopping for secured credit cards?]
Image: anna_t, via Flickr.com
December 13, 2023
Mortgages