The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
Some of the help has gone to people who are underwater, and owe more than their house is worth. Fannie and Freddie refinanced 130,204 mortgages in the first quarter in which the amount owed by the homeowner equaled between 80% and 125% of the mortgage. Of those, 16,894 went to people who were truly underwater, and who owed between 105% and 125% of their house value, according to a report by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees both Fannie and Freddie.
[Article: HAMP Fails to Save Homeowners from Foreclosure]
The old loans were already owned by Fannie or Freddie.
“There’s nothing wrong with letting these people refinance,” says Lawrence J. White , a former Freddie Mac board member and an economics professor at New York University. “It makes sense because it lowers the monthly payment, which reduces the likelihood of a foreclosure, which reduces the burden on Fannie and Freddie later on.”
In total, Fannie and Freddie have made 752,000 loan modifications through the Obama Administration’s Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) since the program started in April 2009. That’s far short of the administration’s stated goal of helping 4 million people avoid foreclosure.
[Article: We Must Kill Mortgage Mods to Save Them, Neugebauer Says]
In other areas, both Fannie and Freddie reported that their finances continued to improve since the government took control of both companies in 2008. About 4.5% of the mortgages owned by the companies are over 60 days delinquent, down from almost 6% at the end of 2009. The number of foreclosure starts continued to drop, from a record high of 339,000 in the third quarter of 2010 to 260,000 last quarter.
The majority of newly modified loans contained major breaks for homeowners. In 51% of loan modifications completed in the first quarter of 2011, the principal and interest was cut by more than 30%, according to the report.
Not all the modifications worked. Three months after modification, 9% of loans failed anyway. That’s actually an improvement over the fourth quarter of 2008, when 28% of modified loans failed. The improvement is partly due to the fact that “modifications in 2010 resulted in deeper payment reductions for a greater proportion of borrowers than in earlier periods,” according to the FHFA.
Image: Esther Gibbons, via Flickr.com
December 13, 2023
Mortgages