The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
Cost-conscious car-lovers may find themselves having to compromise on vehicle performance in order to buy cars within their budgets, and for someone who drives a lot or really wants to enjoy getting behind the wheel, that can be a brutal choice.
Recognizing this dilemma, Cars.com organized a “Cheap Speed Challenge” to identify vehicles that cost less than $30,000 and also included features often sought by shoppers who prioritize performance. Experts from Cars.com, MotorWeek and USAToday, along with a real car shopper, spent a few days rigorously testing eight compact coupes, sedans and hatchbacks. The tests included zero-to-60 mph times, quarter-mile times, 60-to-zero mph braking times, a long day on a road course, and a 200-mile mileage test.
Cars were awarded points in 14 categories, and those scores were weighted as such: The experts’ scores accounted for 50% of the total score; 10% came from the shopper’s scores; 30% was based on track performance; and the remaining 10% was based on fuel economy. (It’s unclear from the scorecard the maximum amount of points a car could receive, but scores ranged from 621 points to 878 points.)
Here’s how the judges ranked the eight cars they tested.
8. 2014 Fiat 500 Abarth
Score: 621 points
Cost of model driven: $25,995
7. 2014 Nissan Juke NISMO RS
684 points
$28,345
6. 2014 Hyundai Veloster Turbo
732 points
$27,260
5. 2014 Scion FR-S
736 points
$28,642
4. 2014 Kia Forte5 SX
748 points
$26,865
3. 2014 Ford Fiesta ST
750 points
$25,610
2. 2015 Subaru WRX
807 points
$29,290
1. 2015 Volkswagen GTI
878 points
$26,915
These cars may seem like a bargain compared to other high-performance vehicles, but if you’re looking for your most affordable option, you may have to make concessions in the performance department. Consider older model years of these vehicles (though the performance ratings will likely vary), because sometimes it’s best to go with a used vehicle.
No matter what you decide you want, make sure your car loan payment fits easily into your budget. To see how your credit standing will affect how much your loan costs and whether or not you’ll qualify for financing, check you free credit scores on Credit.com. Regularly monitoring your credit before applying for a loan can give you a good idea of where you stand.
Image: Sarah Larson
September 13, 2021
Uncategorized
August 4, 2021
Uncategorized
January 28, 2021
Uncategorized