The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
If technology exists that could stop scammy robocalls before they pester and cheat Americans, why don’t phone companies use it? That’s the crux of a letter sent Tuesday by attorneys general from 39 states and territories to the Federal Communications Commission.
Software with names like NoMoRobo, Call Control and Telemarketing Guard can root out many unwanted and potentially criminal calls, the AGs said.
“Illegal telemarketing calls are a source of irritation and fraud,” Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine said. “Enforcement efforts alone will not solve the problem. We need to determine whether call-blocking technologies can be used by phone companies to protect consumers from unwanted calls and scams.”
The telephone industry is reluctant to use technology to stop calls, however, because it believes doing so would be illegal. In testimony submitted to Congress last year, representatives of telecom firms said they have a statutory obligation to complete calls.
At the moment, phone calls are blocked only by direct customer request, and then, only specific numbers are blocked. Robocallers have become proficient at evading such hurdles.
In its letter, the attorneys general ask FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler to make a legal determination about the use of new call-blocking technologies.
“State law enforcement officials are doing everything possible to track down and prosecute those that engage in illegal telemarketing. However, law enforcement cannot fight this battle alone. Call-blocking technology like NoMoRobo, Call Control, and Telemarketing Guard appears to be the first major advancement towards a solution,” it reads. “Nonetheless, the telephone companies’ resistance to embrace call-blocking technology, as evidenced (by industry response to Congress) raises important questions. If a solution to the nation’s illegal telemarketing problem is possible, it will require the private sector — including telephone carriers — to get involved.”
States and territories that signed the letter to the FCC are: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wyoming.
Image: Sarah Holmlund
September 13, 2021
Uncategorized
August 4, 2021
Uncategorized
January 28, 2021
Uncategorized