Home > News > Hackers Target the World Cup

Comments 0 Comments
Advertiser Disclosure


Hackers are planning to attack the FIFA World Cupaccording to a report by Infosecurity Magazine. The article cited two hackers. One called Che Commodore spoke with Reuters and explained that the infamous hacker group Anonymous has already begun to look for weaknesses in World Cup-related websites it can exploit.

Commodore said the group plans to execute Denial of Service attacks on high-profile sponsors of the event. Denial of Service attacks flood Web servers with so much bandwidth usage they shut down.

“We have already conducted late-night tests to see which of the sites are more vulnerable,” he said. “We have a plan of attack.”

The second hacker is known as AnonManifest, who breached the Brazilian Foreign Ministry’s network and stole 300 confidential documents.

The Price of Prestige

Hacker groups like Anonymous like to use high-profile events like the World Cup because of the added publicity it gives them, said David Howorth, vice president at Alert Logic, an IT network security firm.

Howorth added those vulnerable to an attack during the World Cup should plan a strategy for preventing Denial of Service attacks, as well as taking the usual precautions to ensure all computer applications are patched and that all firewalls are configured as they should be.

​Learning from Sochi

The threats to the World Cup are no different from the threats that were faced by sponsors of the Sochi 2014 Winter Olympics.

One group affiliated with Anonymous, called Anonymous Caucasus, threatened to hack sites in the same way that Anonymous is threatening to hack sites affiliated with the FIFA World Cup. The group threatened to use the Olympics as a way of stealing information through spreading malware and using phishing scams. They also executed Denial of Service attacks against several websites, which shut down the website belonging to Russia’s national games committee.

How Big a Problem? By the Numbers…

The sheer number of hacking attempts that various groups can make during something like an Olympic event can be enormous. China was subject to about 12 million cyberattacks a day during the 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing, according to Public Intelligence.  When the Olympics ended in China, it wasn’t long before London, which hosted the 2012 games, became subject to hacking attempts as well. Even during the London Olympics, there were hackers planning to execute cyberattacks against the Olympic Games in Sochi.

If a company is going to be part of a major event, it needs to think about security well in advance.

More on Identity Theft:

Image: Digital Vision

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team