The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
Own an investment property? Thinking about buying a property for income producing purposes? It’s going to cost you. For years, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have charged premiums for individuals purchasing property for the purposes of generating income, higher than for primary residence homes, and rightfully so — the higher the risk, the higher the cost. Conversely, the opposite holds true — the lower the risk, the lower the cost. In mortgage financing, perception creates reality in the eyes of the bondholders who hold the securities tied to homes not occupied by the owners of record.
A mortgage banking institution looks at an investment property this way: “In a foreclosure situation, which property will the owner more than likely give up — the primary home or the investment property?” This sole reason is why investment property financing costs more.
An investor purchases an income-producing property as an investment. Investors understand there is always some degree of risk associated with an opportunity. Because the emotional concerns are not as prevalent as they are when buying a primary home, the transaction becomes more of a numbers decision. With the higher risk of an investor walking away, non-owner-occupied loans cost more.
While it varies based on market fluctuation, you can generally expect investment property financing to be at least 0.5% higher in rate when compared to primary home financing.
In mortgage finance, pricing adjusters are added to a loan, which can change the structure, and/or costs associated with taking out the mortgage.
The biggest pricing adjuster is occupancy, with an adjustment of 1.75% of the loan amount. In other words, a lender prices a mortgage by raising or lowering the interest rate based on any applicable adjusters like loan-to-value and credit score in addition to property occupancy. Let’s say, for example, that you’re looking for the lowest possible rate on an investment property loan, paying discount points. Assuming you had excellent credit and extremely low loan-to-value — such as a loan of 60% of the property value or lower — you’d pay 1.75% of the loan amount in the form of discount points to secure the lowest possible interest rate. Want to avoid the premium? Take a higher interest rate and the lender can absorb this percentage by raising your interest rate upwards of 0.5%.
Mortgage financing for income property is certainly tighter than primary residence home financing. The financial markets want to promote homeownership and have a larger appetite in originating primary residence loans then income property loans, again due to potential credit risk. However, successfully securing investment property financing is absolutely possible.
Final Tip: Two credit characteristics carry the most weight of reducing cost than any other facet: An excellent credit score combined with a very low loan-to-value can help offset the inherent higher cost of financing an income property.
Image: iStockphoto
September 13, 2021
Uncategorized
August 4, 2021
Uncategorized
January 28, 2021
Uncategorized