The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
Even now, a year after the related robo-signing scandal broke, Fannie Mae still lacks the internal controls to prevent its lawyers from breaking the law. The company’s attempts to fix the problem have been “ineffective,” according to the report, published by the inspector general for the Federal Housing Finance Agency, (FHFA) which oversees Fannie Mae.
[Identity Theft: Free Identity Risk Score and profile from Credit.com]
As Fannie Mae struggles to improve, regulators should be particularly tough “(g)iven Fannie Mae’s history of non-compliance,” according to the report.
The company has other weaknesses as well, the report found. Its computer systems are outdated and poorly integrated with one another, and it’s doing a poor job of managing the private mortgage servicers that handle the day-to-day administration of the loans.
[Featured Product: Research and Compare Identity Theft Monitoring Services on Credit.com]
Such lax internal control has allowed illegal behavior to fester for at least five years, the report found. An internal investigation at Fannie Mae found in 2006 that “some of its foreclosure attorneys were sacrificing accuracy for speed, i.e., filing false documents in foreclosure proceedings,” according to the report.
And yet in the ensuing years, the company did not “make any improvements in its oversight of its law firms.”
The inspector general calls on Fannie Mae and FHFA to improve their systems to make sure that foreclosure laws are followed.
[Related article: Lawsuits: Big Banks Defrauded Taxpayers for $200 Billion]
Image: futureatlas.com, via Flickr.com
December 13, 2023
Mortgages