The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
With this is mind, let us reconsider the credit score. Today it is sacrosanct — the gateway between all reputable financial institutions and almost every big, responsible account in our lives. Whether it’s a mortgage, a new credit card, a small loan to buy a car, and in some states, to get insurance — there’s the credit score staring us in the face, forcing us to reconcile with its power.
Of course it wasn’t always this way. But how did we get here and when? And what can the genealogy tell us about the future?
Credit scores didn’t become widely used by financial institutions until the early 1980s. Before then, lenders took a more “romantic” approach — i.e. they basically observed human behavior and intuited whether the would-be borrower was a good investment. Anyone who’s ever been wrong about anything (i.e. all of us), can guess that this method didn’t always work out for the best. Maybe someone fails to make eye contact because he’s hiding something, or maybe he’s just shy; Buddhists remind us that all judgements are fictions.
[Credit Score Tool: Get your free credit score and report card from Credit.com]
Insurers watched all this happening from a related perch and wanted to get in on the data action. They used the model of credit score to create a very similar standard called the insurance risk score, which was used to predict the number and size of claims each consumer would make on his/her insurer.
We often think of credit scores as “ours” but in reality they are tiers created by financial institutions for themselves to gauge the level of risk when lending to you. By the end of the 1980s, credit scores were popping up all over the place as a norming factor across many variables that included amount of debt, number of late payments, age of accounts and other metrics. The thinking is that a numerical, multi-polar representation of past financial behavior is a strong predictor of future financial behavior. And since these lenders are such cold-eyed realists we have to assume that since the use of credit scores is only increasing — it must be working, at least to a degree.
[Related Article: Credit Score Impact on Your Car Insurance Rates]
Added data points by way of historical knowledge have only sharpened the practice of affixing credit scores to humans. But this proliferation has not been without its critics and resistance, asserting that judging future behavior based on the past is confusing correlation for causation. Many understandably feel the current system unfairly punishes those already economically disadvantaged, especially those who suffered financial damages through no fault of their own (see: Hurricane Katrina). In other words, the poor pay more for insurance relative to their income than do those who earn much more annually.
In response, California, Hawaii and Massachusetts have each made it illegal to use a customer’s credit score as a factor when arriving at a car insurance rate. It does appear the tide is turning, however slowly, against the use of credit scores in the insurance sphere. Nevertheless, the carriers and credit bureaus will not go down without a fight, and they have the lobbyists lined up in Washington to prove it. Perhaps the entrance of data — via GPS devices and other gadgets that monitor us on the roads — as it pertains specifically to our driving behavior and aptitude will yield strong enough metrics that credit scores will no longer be needed when arriving at car insurance rates.
[Free Resource: Check your credit score and report card for free with Credit.com]
This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not represent the views of the company or its affiliates.
Image: Amy the Nurse, via Flickr
March 7, 2023
Credit Score
January 4, 2021
Credit Score
September 29, 2020
Credit Score