The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
How often do I get to combine my favorite topics — consumer behavior, beer, hockey, and ripoffs — in the same story! Hockey fans (of course, hockey fans) in Idaho have sued a minor league team for using differently-shaped but equal volume plastic cups for their small ($4) and large ($7) sizes.
Thanks, Idaho Statesman for being all over this story.
A YouTube video produced by hockey-and-beer fans Heath and Gwen Hunt pours out the convincing evidence, as the couple pours to contents into one tall and thin cup into the other short and fat cup, and the volume is clearly similar.
The team has responded to a social-media driven outcry, and half-a-million YouTube views, and ordered larger beer cups. Now that’s what I call a happy ending.
[Read More: 3 Bank Account Gotchas]
“It was recently brought to our attention that the amount of beer that fits in our large (20-oz) cups also fits in our regular (16-oz) cups. The differentiation in the size of the two cups is too small,” wrote Eric Trapp, the president of the Idaho Steelheads in a post on the team’s Facebook page. “To correct that problem, we’re purchasing new cups for the large beers that will hold 24 ounces, instead of 20, for the remainder of this season to provide better value to our fans. As we do every offseason, we’ll evaluate our entire concessions menu for next season over the summer,”
These kinds of optical illusions are a common staple in the war that is consumers vs. retailers. Humans are actually very bad at judging volume, for example. Tell the truth — aren’t you surprised the cups are equal? And of course, shrinking volume on items we love is a time-tested, sneaky way for companies to make more money from us. (Go ahead, try to find an actual quart jar of ANYTHING these days.) Rather than raise the price, they shrink the item, a technique sometimes called Inflation by Degradation. My friend Ed Dworsky covers this issue all the time at Mouseprint.org
Let this be a lesson to you: buy beer from bartenders you trust.
Image: iStock
April 11, 2023
Uncategorized
September 13, 2021
Uncategorized
August 4, 2021
Uncategorized